Skip to content

Build and test conda-recipe-cf for Intel Python CI - #204

Open
jharlow-intel wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
ci/intel-python-ci
Open

jharlow-intel wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
ci/intel-python-ci

Conversation

@jharlow-intel

@jharlow-intel jharlow-intel commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Adds what Intel Python CI (gh-ci) needs from mkl_random: a ci/ directory and a new workflow, .github/workflows/intel-ci.yml. The workflow builds conda-recipe-cf for every platform and Python version the recipe declares, and tests each package in a clean conda-forge environment with ci/test.py. Intel's Jenkins then waits for that run, tests each package again on its own machines, scans it, and for a release tag publishes the packages it tested. Jenkins isn't switched on for mkl_random yet, so until it is, this only adds a GitHub Actions workflow.

  • ci/matrix.py, ci/build.py, ci/hooks.py: the shared gh-ci scripts, standard library only. Here they look for conda-recipe-cf/ first and build Linux and Windows on GitHub-hosted runners. hooks.py installs the test requirements from ci/config.yml, the way Jenkins does.
  • ci/test.py: runs pytest --pyargs mkl_random against the installed package and writes a JUnit report.
  • ci/config.yml: the workflow, the artifact names (mkl_random {platform} Python {python}, as conda-package-cf.yml names them) and the test requirements, pytest.
  • conda-recipe-cf/conda_build_config.yaml: now lists the Python versions, the ones conda-package-cf.yml builds today, for ci/matrix.py, and numpy: '2'. Without a NumPy variant, conda-build falls back to NumPy 1.26, which has no builds for Python 3.13 and newer. conda-package-cf.yml passes --python and --numpy itself, so it is unaffected.
  • ci/README.md and AGENTS.md notes.

A pull request builds the two newest regular Python versions on Linux and Windows; pushes to master and tags build them all.

Miniforge is pinned to 26.7.2-0. Miniforge 26.9.4-0, released on 22 October, makes setup-miniconda's conda init fail on Windows runners, and the existing conda-package*.yml workflows, which install latest, hit it too on this pull request.

Overlap with #202. It also sets numpy: '2' in conda_build_config.yaml and drops Python 3.10, so whichever lands second needs a small rebase, and if 3.10 goes it should leave the python: list here too. conda-package-cf.yml and intel-ci.yml now both build conda-recipe-cf; retiring one can be a follow-up.

Verification

  • Tests: this pull request's Intel Python CI run built Linux and Windows for Python 3.14 and 3.15 and ran ci/test.py against each package: 380 passed on Linux 3.14 and on Windows 3.15.
  • Lint: pre-commit run on every changed file, all hooks passing, and zizmor on intel-ci.yml, no findings.
  • python ci/matrix.py lists 14 builds, Linux and Windows for 3.10 to 3.15 and 3.14t; with --event pull_request it lists 3.14 and 3.15 on both.
  • ci/config.yml loads with gh-ci's own parser.

Not verified

  • The builds a tag or a push to the default branch adds, Python 3.10 to 3.13 and 3.14t; they use the same jobs.
  • The Jenkins side, which isn't enabled for mkl_random yet.

Adds what Intel Python CI (gh-ci) needs from this repository: ci/ with the
shared matrix, build and test-hook scripts, ci/test.py and ci/config.yml, and
.github/workflows/intel-ci.yml, which builds conda-recipe-cf for every platform
and Python version the recipe declares and tests each package in a clean
conda-forge environment, as Jenkins later does.

conda-recipe-cf/conda_build_config.yaml now declares the Python versions
conda-package-cf.yml builds, for ci/matrix.py, and NumPy 2: without a numpy
variant conda-build falls back to NumPy 1.26, which has no builds for Python
3.13 and newer. conda-package-cf.yml passes --python and --numpy itself, so it
is unaffected.
@jharlow-intel
jharlow-intel marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2026 20:42

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant