You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Accuracy Core Package Test Coverage Managed by coverall.io #154
We need to get the accuracy core package tests to have their coverage computed by coveralls.io. This replaces #106 as that issue has become a bit too big.
@SergeStinckwich An update on this - I'm splitting out the test for testDataTree to its own class & separating out the assertions to their own test methods. That way it's easy to tell which failed. Suggests the methods does a lot too (code smell?)!
@SergeStinckwich The PMAccuracy class is used in the Function-Fit package, where it is the parent of PMGAAccuracy. I'd like to replace the two remaining calls to argument in the latter with argumentWith: until we can find a way to use the reflection-based code in findKey safely.
Activity
hemalvarambhia commentedon Nov 6, 2019
@SergeStinckwich An update on this - I'm splitting out the test for
testDataTreeto its own class & separating out the assertions to their own test methods. That way it's easy to tell which failed. Suggests the methods does a lot too (code smell?)!hemalvarambhia commentedon Mar 15, 2020
Now, as you can see in the travis failure,
testExtractFromResultsWhichOnlyOneis failing and nottestDataTreehas mentioned in my last comment.hemalvarambhia commentedon Mar 29, 2020
@SergeStinckwich The
PMAccuracyclass is used in theFunction-Fitpackage, where it is the parent ofPMGAAccuracy. I'd like to replace the two remaining calls toargumentin the latter withargumentWith:until we can find a way to use the reflection-based code infindKeysafely.