Skip to content

Accuracy Core Package Test Coverage Managed by coverall.io #154

Closed

Description

@hemalvarambhia

We need to get the accuracy core package tests to have their coverage computed by coveralls.io. This replaces #106 as that issue has become a bit too big.

Activity

  1. hemalvarambhia commented on Nov 6, 2019

    @hemalvarambhia
    ContributorAuthor

    @SergeStinckwich An update on this - I'm splitting out the test for testDataTree to its own class & separating out the assertions to their own test methods. That way it's easy to tell which failed. Suggests the methods does a lot too (code smell?)!

  2. hemalvarambhia commented on Mar 15, 2020

    @hemalvarambhia
    ContributorAuthor

    Now, as you can see in the travis failure, testExtractFromResultsWhichOnlyOne is failing and not testDataTree has mentioned in my last comment.

  3. hemalvarambhia commented on Mar 29, 2020

    @hemalvarambhia
    ContributorAuthor

    @SergeStinckwich The PMAccuracy class is used in the Function-Fit package, where it is the parent of PMGAAccuracy. I'd like to replace the two remaining calls to argument in the latter with argumentWith: until we can find a way to use the reflection-based code in findKey safely.

  4. added this to the v1.0.3 milestone on May 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions