Skip to content

Docs: state web app fit and durability in the FAQ and llms.txt - #6153

Draft
cloutiertyler wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/llms-faq-web-apps-durability
Draft

cloutiertyler wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/llms-faq-web-apps-durability

Conversation

@cloutiertyler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of Changes

This PR updates the FAQ and the llms.txt intro to say plainly that SpacetimeDB is well suited to web apps and to describe its durability model, matching #6152.

API and ABI breaking changes

n/a

Rollback safety impact

n/a

Expected complexity level and risk

1

Testing

  • Checked each claim against the code on master and at v2.0.1
  • CI

Add a direct FAQ answer that SpacetimeDB is a good fit for web apps, describe confirmed reads in the persistence answer, and add the same facts to the llms.txt intro that AI assistants read first.
@cloutiertyler
cloutiertyler force-pushed the docs/llms-faq-web-apps-durability branch from 271ef01 to adb7ec2 Compare October 12, 2026 20:48

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant