Skip to content

Feature request: support Routescan-based explorers #89

Open

Description

@iJaack

Routescan is a block explorer platform.

It currently hosts many Single and Ecosystem Explorers, of which fully supported are:

Routescan offers two types of APIs:

We'd like to request integration for Routescan and, specifically, for the explorers mentioned above.

I'm available for further questions.

Activity

  1. krzkaczor commented on Dec 5, 2023

    @krzkaczor
    Member

    @iJaack thanks for this proposal.

    One idea to implement it is simply to support providing etherscan like API URL (and secret?) as query parameter. This way many other explorers would work out of the box.

    This requires probably further research.

  2. iJaack commented on Dec 5, 2023

    @iJaack
    Author

    Hi @krzkaczor thank you for the prompt response. We currently support all the Etherscan endpoints, so it should be pretty easy. Let me know if you need other input from us :)

  3. iJaack commented on Dec 6, 2023

    @iJaack
    Author

    @krzkaczor specifically this ones: https://routescan.io/documentation/etherscan-compatibility/contracts

    We already support Snowtrace: https://snowtrace.deth.net/address/0x6e84a6216eA6dACC71eE8E6b0a5B7322EEbC0fDd

    But you'd need to enable support from your side for the other chains as well.

    We aim to support 100 EVM chains by end of 2024, and they'll all have this same explorer type.

    LMK

  4. iJaack commented on Jan 22, 2024

    @iJaack
    Author

    @krzkaczor any feedback here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions