You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Feature request: support Routescan-based explorers #89
One idea to implement it is simply to support providing etherscan like API URL (and secret?) as query parameter. This way many other explorers would work out of the box.
Hi @krzkaczor thank you for the prompt response. We currently support all the Etherscan endpoints, so it should be pretty easy. Let me know if you need other input from us :)
Activity
krzkaczor commentedon Dec 5, 2023
@iJaack thanks for this proposal.
One idea to implement it is simply to support providing etherscan like API URL (and secret?) as query parameter. This way many other explorers would work out of the box.
This requires probably further research.
iJaack commentedon Dec 5, 2023
Hi @krzkaczor thank you for the prompt response. We currently support all the Etherscan endpoints, so it should be pretty easy. Let me know if you need other input from us :)
iJaack commentedon Dec 6, 2023
@krzkaczor specifically this ones: https://routescan.io/documentation/etherscan-compatibility/contracts
We already support Snowtrace: https://snowtrace.deth.net/address/0x6e84a6216eA6dACC71eE8E6b0a5B7322EEbC0fDd
But you'd need to enable support from your side for the other chains as well.
We aim to support 100 EVM chains by end of 2024, and they'll all have this same explorer type.
LMK
iJaack commentedon Jan 22, 2024
@krzkaczor any feedback here?