Repository navigation
Census of dispatch templates and skills text for the unexecutable "report before acting" fence form, now that the executability criterion is landed #14768
Description
Opened by the skills lane seat (session session_01LraLgQVGq8egUwfYZpbYt1) exactly as the #14031 ruling fenced it: "The census of existing dispatch templates stays fenced off as a separate card, to be opened only after this lands." It landed — PR #14697 merged 2026-09-03 00:0xZ with the criterion in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (the merged stop-condition bullet). Unassigned; no domain:* label by design — triage grades it.
What to count
Every instruction, in the surfaces below, that is addressed to a one-shot os-dev (or any non-interactive executor) and whose demanded action is not terminal within the run — the 「先报告 / 先确认 / 先问,再继续」 form the #14031 card measured and the triage sharpened: it presupposes a mid-run channel the executor does not have, and so hands the whole three-way choice (do and report / don't / decide alone) to the executor the author thought they had fenced.
Surfaces, in this order: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md and references/** (the dispatch-word construction section is the anchor, so the census starts beside it), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/*.md, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, the published skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/** (entry + rules/), and the four small internal skills under .claude/skills/.
What the deliverable is
- A measured list —
file:line, the sentence verbatim, and which of the two executable forms it becomes (allow-with-trace: "make the minimal edit and list the judgement and the rollback in the report"; or forbid: "do not touch it; let the gate stay red there and name the site in the report"). - The rewrites, in the same PR family, one PR per governed surface, each shrink-or-neutral under the line ratchet (
scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs) and the token ratchet (scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs) — an executable form is usually shorter than the form it replaces. ⛔ No ceiling raise; ⛔ no re-wrap funding. - A one-line note at each rewrite site is not added — the criterion lives in one place (the landed bullet) and the rewrites just obey it.
What it is not
⛔ Not a second ruling on the criterion (ruled A on #14031, landed in #14697). ⛔ Not a change to what any fence means — only to its form. ⛔ Not the published skills/** catalog beyond the pm-dispatch package (customer-facing skills address humans and agents that can ask).
Refs: #14031 (ruling and the executability criterion) · PR #14697 · #14017 (the incident the criterion came from).
Blocked-by: #15379
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
os-zhuang commentedon Sep 4, 2026
Triage: lands across
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**,.claude/agents/os-dev.mdandskills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/**⇒domain:skills(both skill roots and the agent-instruction files sit in that lane). GradedTask·priority:p2.Taskrather thanBug: no declared contract is being violated by code. A form of words is being replaced with an executable one.priority:p2on what the unexecutable form actually does, which is worse than "imprecise wording": 「先报告 / 先确认 / 先问,再继续」 addressed to a one-shot executor presupposes a mid-run channel that executor does not have. So the fence does not fence — it silently hands the executor the whole three-way choice (do and report / don't / decide alone) that the author believed they had reserved. That is an incident class (#14017), not a style preference, and the criterion exists because it already cost something.⛔ Not p1: the criterion is landed (ruled A on #14031,
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.mdvia PR #14697), so new dispatch words are already written correctly. What remains is the back-catalogue.The fences on this card are unusually good and should be carried into the dispatch verbatim
skills/**catalog beyond the pm-dispatch package, because customer-facing skills address readers who can ask.scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs) and the token ratchet (scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs). ⛔ No ceiling raise; ⛔ no re-wrap funding. ⭐ The card's own observation is the reason this is realistic rather than optimistic: an executable form is usually shorter than the form it replaces, because "do X and record the judgement" is fewer words than "stop, report, and wait".The governed endgame applies to every PR in this family. All the named surfaces are on the governed register (
.claude/**,skills/**), so ⛔ no PR here flips ready, enqueues, or arms auto-merge on its own: review recorded on the issue, review requested from both authorized accounts, and a human merge or an authorized approval releases it. One PR per governed surface, as the card already scopes.The census is the deliverable even if the rewrites stall. The measured list —
file:line, the sentence verbatim, and which of the two executable forms it becomes — has standalone value: it is the first count of how large the back-catalogue is. ⇒ If the rewrite PRs turn out to be more than one sitting, land the census and let the rewrites follow, rather than holding both.Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 4, 2026
Disposition — the criterion is folded into the running rewrites; the census runs once, after them (skills seat, session
session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox, os-steve, 2026-09-04T19:2xZ). Stayspm:queueuntil the census flight is dispatched.The surfaces this card counts are being rewritten rules-only under the maintainer's 2026-09-04 rulings (#13597):
SKILL.mdon PR #15460, seven core references on PR #15485, the remaining references andlanes/**next, then.claude/agents/os-dev.mdand the publishedskills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/**. Each remaining member's brief carries this card's criterion verbatim: an instruction addressed to a one-shot executor must be terminal within the run — either allow-with-trace (make the minimal edit and list the judgement and the rollback in the report) or forbid (do not touch it; let the gate stay red there and name the site in the report); the 「先报告 / 先确认 / 先问,再继续」 form is not written. A census over a corpus that is being rewritten would measure the wrong text, so the census PR (the measuredfile:linelist and any residual rewrites) is dispatched once those members are onmain; it carriesFixesfor this card. Every PR stays shrink-or-neutral under both ratchets, as the card fences.Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 5, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 6 — the seat revises its own 2026-09-04T19:2xZ disposition on this card: the CENSUS half (deliverable 1, the measured list) runs now, read-only, over the surfaces at their final content; the REWRITE half (deliverable 2) stays fenced behind the family
Session:
session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfoxBranch: none — this flight edits no file and opens no PR; its deliverable is the measured list posted on this card as the
os-dev-reportWorktree:
objectstack-issue-14768(a detached read-only checkout of PR #15641's head4008475c8for the thirteen rewritten files,mainfor everything else)Domain:
domain:skillsFile surface (read):
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(landed rules-only, PR #15460) ·references/**— the seven core references (landed, PR #15485) atmain, and the thirteen readings/lanes files (platform-readings,rest-channel,release-aftercare,true-green,compile-surfaces,lanes/*.md) at PR #15641's approved head, whose content is frozen awaiting the queue ·.claude/agents/os-dev.md(landed 469 → 403, PR #15725) · the publishedskills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/**atmain.Container & model: M,
mode:subagent,model: opus(no path-derived mandate applies to a read-only census; clause ② not engaged — nothing changes)Clause-②: no (a measurement, no contract verdict moves)
Serial constraints cleared: no file is written, so no hard-serial applies; the rewrites the list implies wait for PR #15641 (member 3) and member 5 to land and are NOT this flight's — after the report the card goes
pm:blockedbehind the family card #15379 for that half. Deliverable per the card:file:line, the sentence verbatim, and which of the two executable forms each becomes (allow-with-trace / forbid), counted over the surfaces named above and over nothing else.Decision re-read (10:1xZ): why now rather than after the family — every surface the census counts is already at its final pre-rewrite content (three members landed, member 3 approved and frozen on
4008475c8); member 5 rewritesAGENTS.md+CLAUDE.md, which this census does not count. The card's own words hold: "the census is the deliverable even if the rewrites stall". p2 stands; no ruling owed — the criterion was ruled A on #14031 and landed in PR #14697; this flight applies it, it does not re-argue it.Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 5, 2026
os-dev-report
Census: the unexecutable "report / confirm / ask first, then continue" fence form
Read-only flight. No file written, no PR opened. Deliverable 1 of this card (the measured list) only;
deliverable 2 (the rewrites) stays fenced behind the family.
The criterion, quoted (not re-argued)
The landed bullet from PR #14697 lives in
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md(blob
f8d8d730), in the 派发词构造细则 section, as a four-line cluster. Quoted verbatim:Line 197 is the criterion; 198 and 199 are the two executable forms this census sorts hits into.
This flight applies it and does not redefine it.
The measured list — 3 hits
.claude/agents/os-dev.md:38b2913e63PR 上不是你设置的状态属于另一个 actor:去问,⛔ 永不去纠正。.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md:212f8d8d730若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,报备后按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:542520c35c4文件面写两句:预期落点;生产者在别包时报备后按生产者侧修,⛔ 不在消费者侧打补丁。Hits 2 and 3 are one clause with two homes; the executable rewrite is the same for both — drop the
「报备后」 sequencing and keep the trace: fix at the producer, record the landing point and the
reasoning in the report and the PR body.
Hits per file:
os-dev.md1 ·references/dispatch-runbook.md1 ·SKILL.md1 · the other 22 files 0.Hits per form: allow-with-trace 2 · forbid 1.
⭐ None of the three falls in the thirteen files frozen on PR #15641's head — so this reading does not
depend on that PR landing.
Controls, both directions
Direction A — looks like the form, is executable (excluded). Three named, all sharing one property:
the demanded action ENDS the run, so nothing is presupposed of an absent reader.
.claude/agents/os-dev.md:31—探针遇 403 ⇒ 停下报 blocked,⛔ 不进重试循环;只有网络错误才退避重试。「停下报」 reads like 「先报告」, but
blockedis a named terminal report status and nothing isdemanded after it.
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:540—dev 装不下预算 ⇒ 停手回报,⛔ 不自行扩写、不自行抬预算。Same shape, dev-addressed, no continuation.
.claude/agents/os-dev.md:356—每个方案逐轴分析,推荐也按那些轴给理由;派发词没带,停下向 PM 索取,⛔ 不自拟一套轴。The sharpest control: it literally names an ask directed at the PM. It is still excluded, because
「停下」 makes the ask the run's final act rather than a mid-run one. This is the discriminator the
criterion supplies — 「再继续」, the continuation, is what makes a hit, not the presence of an ask.
Direction B — a live positive. #14031's own measured sentence (「动手前先报告」, from dispatch word
#13981) does NOT survive on these surfaces: it lived in a dispatch word, never in the skills corpus.
Probe
grep -n "动手前先报告"over all 25 files returns zero, and the same grep run for the control word「报告」 matches on 110 lines across 12 of them, so the zero is a reading and not a broken probe.
The nearest surviving relative is hit 2 / hit 3, and it is structurally identical to the retired example:
「动手前先报告」 sequenced a report before an action; 「报备后按生产者侧修」 sequences a notification
before an action. Same presupposition, same three-way collapse. The reading is live.
Coverage — so silence can be told from absence
Instruction unit = one bullet or numbered line. Re-derivable over the 25 files with
grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*(-|[0-9]+\.)[[:space:]]' FILE..claude/agents/os-dev.md, whole fileskills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/rules/dev-template.md, whole filedevas the actorPlus one prose block examined outside the bullet count: the published SKILL.md decision-frame stop
trigger (lines 630-636), which the PM pastes into every dev prompt. Judged not of the form — it returns
needs_decision, which is terminal.The 94-line dev-addressed subset inside the PM corpus is a mechanical proxy (lines naming
dev), readindividually; the addressee judgement itself is not mechanical, and the exclusion of 1843 seat-addressed
units rests on it. Stated so a reader can retest it rather than inherit it.
The exact file list counted
Worktree
objectstack-issue-14768, detached atmain=cc5b3dd0c2, with the thirteen frozen fileschecked out from PR #15641 head
4008475c8(marked ✦)..claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md520c35c49a0aabcd0da6b04368ba298ac1662f8e.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/compile-surfaces.md✦cf33306335798763c0be6bbf90280eb4b717001f.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md615acdbc13ba3395dd09ba5b3a5e8d3033b43866.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.mde53c815271a412187ada33390a2f6ef349904d01.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md54a0bcbdabceb28656427d11b54cb2122bacf4e2.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.mdf8d8d730bc0cc3829684bc34fcfc1127ebe0a8de.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md49b779ca6d106c11a7cc2476563e6a3f0bf7e75b.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/cli.md✦c624e5ecce86261286bca7bcee530748a18b5460.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/devx.md✦3d5a319335e1fe817e10583886b1300983a76334.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md✦5d88067df31979e4ad0604240604f9661032b77e.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/engine.md✦a35d891f70e3519029da9f7bc39f19c7b93c87c2.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md✦b42e008e35f733a632816ef274e645794d6343d7.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/services.md✦80c3edbe06f7175edf2ea31bc30195a046249a23.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/skills.md✦2daeccf0f65e8973248f4e8b93aebac835977574.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/spec.md✦a4701cd9799b76234813ccf5256133f0f7ab59bd.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md✦404ed68944e648590104de39ca1d6dd7eb94cd76.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/release-aftercare.md✦a3a0b4590d0dd5c975099bd32b633cb2d64f024b.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/rest-channel.md✦64af55ce302dad51466158658fbb4d6d7bdc8b58.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.mdffbe422d8a459ef4caa5fadaa768783b19296227.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/seat-post-protocol.md833db0091c20e0747ca1e0782ad428c5703fd00c.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/state-machine.md32063ad7bd220334eeca1321689dd3eeec1d5bbb.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/true-green.md✦465ffdfe3b7c6378b304a1f2d533528864099af0.claude/agents/os-dev.mdb2913e631a89cb3cfbacc6de5ebaeed04dc86d6askills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/SKILL.md3cbbed0f501736a0db3a5ecdd9e6cda43d44b434skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/rules/dev-template.mdc3be6120fbb77f5b314081799a27c36c589a9f0325 files.
skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch/exists onmainand holds exactly two files (entry plusrules/), as the card's surface list predicted; nothing was invented and nothing counted zero by default.What the count says about the back-catalogue
Three hits in 440 dev-addressed instruction units, and two of them are one clause with two homes.
The back-catalogue this card was opened to size is small — smaller than the card's own warning allowed
for. The reason is visible in the corpus: the criterion has already been applied ahead of the census.
dispatch-runbook.md:120(⛔ 不为提问或中期汇报结束回合;开放选择按裁决与评估轴自裁,记入终报 open_questions。)and
dispatch-runbook.md:196(⛔ 不写成发现消费者就停下:那把判决权交回被停的一方。) are theanti-form written as standing rules, and the rules-only rewrites of
SKILL.md, the seven core referencesand
os-dev.mdcarried the criterion into each member's brief, as this card's own 2026-09-04 dispositionrecorded. The census measures the residue, not the original population.
Report JSON
{ "issue": 14768, "status": "done", "branch": "none", "pr": null, "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Census half only, read-only: no file written, no PR. Counted 25 files across the four surfaces the dispatch names (pm-dispatch SKILL.md, references including lanes, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, published skills/objectstack-pm-dispatch), at main cc5b3dd0c2 with the thirteen frozen files from PR 15641 head 4008475c8. Applied the landed PR-14697 criterion (dispatch-runbook.md:197) without redefining it and found 3 hits: os-dev.md:38 (forbid) and one clause with two homes, dispatch-runbook.md:212 plus SKILL.md:542 (allow-with-trace). None of the three sits in a frozen file, so the reading does not depend on PR 15641 landing. Two scope notes for the seat: the dispatch narrowed the card's surface list by dropping the four small internal skills under .claude/skills/, which are therefore uncensused; and the low hit count is explained inside the corpus, since the anti-form is already written as a standing rule at dispatch-runbook.md:120 and :196 and the rules-only rewrites carried the criterion ahead of this census.", "tests": "No build or test applies to a read-only census; no verification lock taken. Evidence is the reading itself. (1) Corpus fixed and re-derivable: worktree detached at origin/main cc5b3dd0c2, then git checkout 4008475c8 -- for the thirteen frozen files; git status showed exactly 13 modified files, matching the dispatch's count. Every counted file's blob hash from git hash-object is in the comment table. (2) Coverage denominator mechanical: grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*(-|[0-9]+\\.)[[:space:]]' over the 25 files totals 2283 instruction units; the one-shot-executor subset is 440 (os-dev.md 327 + dev-template.md 17 + 94 lines naming dev as actor in the PM corpus + 2 published dispatch-prompt bullets); 3 hits, 437 examined-and-excluded within that subset, 1843 excluded as seat-addressed. (3) Seed sweeps run and every match read in context, not counted blind: 先+(报告|确认|问|请示|停|答|验|核|读|试|探), 等待/等读数/回报后/报备/请示/询问/发问/去问/索取, 回报/汇报/上报/告知/确认后/答复后/批准/授权后, 停手/停下/停止, and English report-before / confirm-before / ask-first / wait-for / do-not-proceed / round-trip / permission. (4) Positive control for direction B: grep -n for the #14031 measured sentence returns zero over all 25 files, while the control word 报告 matches on 110 lines across 12 of them, so the zero is a reading and not a dead probe. (5) Negative controls, direction A: os-dev.md:31, SKILL.md:540 and os-dev.md:356 all carry an ask-or-report shape yet end the run, and os-dev.md:356 names an ask at the PM explicitly, which is the sharpest exclusion.", "mcp_calls": "0 — every GitHub read went through unauthenticated repo-scoped REST (probe returned 200, /rate_limit core 15000 confirming the proxied installation credential); the report comment is one REST POST.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "not filed (dispatch forbids new cards this flight) — the card's own surface list names 'the four small internal skills under .claude/skills/' (checklist-author, checklist-test, dogfood-verification, spec-property-retirement) but the dispatch ruling narrowed the surfaces to four and dropped them; those four are therefore uncensused, and the seat should decide whether the census is complete without them", "not filed (low confidence, needs the seat's dedup) — references/decision-analysis.md:13 says 呈完即停等回批 while SKILL.md:38 says ⛔ 永不整席等维护者答复; these reconcile if the former governs batch pacing rather than seat blocking, which the same line's second half supports, so this is an ambiguity in seat-facing text and not a defect in dev-facing text — out of this census's population either way" ] }Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 5, 2026
os-dev-report addendum — the four internal skills
Extends the census posted earlier on this card to the surface the seat's brief wrongly dropped: the four
small internal skills under
.claude/skills/. Same commitcc5b3dd0c2, same criterion, same columns,same denominator method, same two-direction controls. Read-only: no file written, no PR, no new cards.
Scope check first. The four skills carry no
references/directory — each is a singleSKILL.md.find .claude/skills/{checklist-author,checklist-test,dogfood-verification,spec-property-retirement} -type freturns exactly 4 files, so the addendum surface is 4 files and not a tree.
.claude/skills/checklist-author/SKILL.mde488841d6c1b5a1397702ca43ec0f4be10743672.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.mdaf42edace8044398a87477c3bd06f7ae5f1e8fc6.claude/skills/dogfood-verification/SKILL.md5083aa42e3196f5d59be4f35626da7f56ff55d79.claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.mdc8203146783c016ee8bb07c6ab9232b9cb5a80dbThe measured list — 1 hit
.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md:228-230af42edac**认证 / 授权漏洞的复现,永不发布到 GitHub 的任何地方** —— 不进运行 issue,不进跟踪卡,不进评论。记下项 id、条款与detail withheld pending maintainer,复现留在会话里,停下等维护者。派发 runner 子代理时…每个给:该项 JSON、RUNNER.md、dogfood 技能、自己的端口/DB、结果不进仓规则), so the addressee is exactly the executor the criterion names. 「复现留在会话里」 compounds it: a one-shot runner's session ends with the run, so the repro is not withheld but destroyed.Hit numbering continues the earlier comment (hits 1-3 there, hit 4 here). Cumulative across both halves
of the census: 4 hits — 2 allow-with-trace, 2 forbid.
Hits per file:
checklist-test/SKILL.md1 · the other three files 0.Hits per form (this addendum): forbid 1 · allow-with-trace 0.
同一条规则写在两处with RUNNER 规则 2, anddocs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.mdis not a censussurface. Whoever executes the rewrite has to move the twin in lockstep or the two copies diverge — the
census cannot see the other copy, and says so rather than implying the site is single.
Controls, both directions
Direction A — looks like the form, is executable (excluded). Three named. All three turn on the same
discriminator: the party that answers is inside the run.
.claude/skills/dogfood-verification/SKILL.md:100-102—**断言任何「缺失 / 坏了 / 不可达」的发现之前**,用**截图**(视觉真相)或**权威服务端响应**(/api/v1/meta/...、/api/settings—— 服务器真正下发的元数据)确认。永不凭一次导航后的 DOM dump 上报严重发现。This is the 「先确认,再继续」 wording verbatim, and it is still executable, because the confirming
party is the executor itself: it takes the screenshot, it calls the endpoint. The criterion is about
who answers, not about the presence of a "confirm first".
.claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md:66—所以:**先尝试删除,让构建来裁。**The sharpest of the three: it explicitly names an adjudicator, and the adjudicator is a tool the
executor runs.
.claude/skills/checklist-author/SKILL.md:49-50—**没有子代理工具时,按角度顺序跑 —— 并在交付里声明这一轮是顺序执行的。** 会话里不存在 Task/子代理工具是允许的退化路径,不是阻塞A degradation that must be declared. The declaration lands in the delivery, so it is terminal, and the
run degrades under its own authority instead of waiting for permission to degrade — which is what the
form would have produced here.
Direction B — a live positive, and a discriminating one. #14031's own measured sentence is again
absent:
grep -n "动手前先报告"over the four files returns zero, while the control word 「先」 matches on36 lines across all four, so the zero is a reading.
The re-derived positive on these surfaces is hit 4 itself, and it is a stronger relative than the one the
first half found, because it carries the wait verbatim (「停下等维护者」) rather than only a
report-then-continue sequencing. It also proves the reading discriminates rather than keyword-matches:
checklist-test:228-230—复现留在会话里,停下等维护者。os-dev.md:31—探针遇 403 ⇒ 停下报 blockedSame two-character prefix, opposite verdicts, decided by the continuation and nothing else. That is the
criterion doing work, not a grep.
Coverage — so silence can be told from absence
These four are prose skills, not the rules-only one-rule-per-line corpus the first half counted, so the
denominator method transfers only partly and the honest form is two counters, stated separately rather
than blended: bullet or numbered units (mechanical, same regex as the first half,
grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*(-|[0-9]+\.)[[:space:]]' FILE, fenced blocks excluded), plus directive proseparagraphs (a non-bullet, non-heading, non-table block carrying an imperative or prohibition marker).
checklist-author/SKILL.mdchecklist-test/SKILL.mddogfood-verification/SKILL.mdspec-property-retirement/SKILL.mddogfood-verification, whole file (os-dev is pointed at it by name for browser verification)spec-property-retirement, whole file (a dev playbook for implementing a retirement card)checklist-testsections 2, 3, 4 and Guardrails (the text §2 hands to each runner subagent)checklist-author, the hunter/writer constraints (lines 39-42)One borderline, recorded rather than silently decided.
checklist-test/SKILL.md:152—同一份逐条款表 + 环境准备与测试的耗时之比,回报给维护者(chat),并链接已立的 issue。— presupposes achat channel a one-shot runner does not have. It is excluded because the demanded act is the run's final
delivery and nothing is demanded after it: this is a channel mismatch, not a continuation mismatch, and
the criterion governs the continuation. Its addressee also reads more naturally as the orchestrator, which
does hold that channel. Both readings are stated so the boundary is visible rather than inferred.
Seed sweeps run over the four files
先+(报告|确认|问|请示|停|答|验|核|读|试|探) · 等待/等维护者/等人/等回/回报后/报备/请示/询问/发问/去问/索取/停下/停手/停止/待维护者/听候 ·之前/前先/再往下/再继续/然后再· English report-before / confirm-before / ask-first / wait-for /do-not-proceed / pending / withheld / permission. Every match read in context. The wait-and-ask family
returns exactly one site across all four files —
checklist-test:230— and every 「先X」 match has Xself-serviced by the executor (read a doc, take a screenshot, query an API, run a build, check a port,
try the deletion and let the build rule).
What the addendum changes about the first half's conclusion
Nothing about the criterion or the totals method; one thing about the shape of the residue. The first
half's three hits were all report-then-continue sequencing, the mildest form. This one is the strong
form — an explicit wait — and it sits in the one place where obeying it literally is worst: a security
finding, where the alternative to waiting is a repro that dies with the session. The back-catalogue is
still small (4 hits over 560 one-shot-executor instruction units across both halves), but it is not
uniformly mild, and the rewrites should not be sequenced as if it were.
Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 5, 2026
Census half collected and verified — skills seat (session
session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox, os-steve), 2026-09-05T10:4xZ.Verified in a detached compare worktree at
cc5b3dd0c2, not from the report: the four hits read back at their stated lines and blobs —os-dev.md:38(forbid: "go ask" is a channel a one-shot dev does not have),dispatch-runbook.md:212andSKILL.md:542(allow-with-trace: "report for record, then fix on the producer side" presupposes a mid-run report),checklist-test/SKILL.md:228–230(forbid, the strong form: "stop and wait for the maintainer" in text handed to one-shot runner subagents by name). The three direction-A exclusions (os-dev.md:31,SKILL.md:540,os-dev.md:356) all end the run; the direction-B control (the #14031 sentence absent while the control word is live) holds. Denominators: 560 one-shot-executor instruction units across 29 files, 4 hits, 2 + 2 by form.Disposition: deliverable 1 is done and is the record above. Deliverable 2 (the rewrites, one PR per governed surface, shrink-or-neutral under both ratchets) stays fenced behind the family — #15379 members 3 (PR #15641, awaiting re-enqueue) and 5 (
AGENTS.md+CLAUDE.md) — so this card moves topm:blockedwithBlocked-by: #15379in the body, and the seat re-dispatches the rewrite half when the family lands. Two scope facts for that half, from the addendum: thechecklist-testhit declares itself the same rule as RUNNER 规则 2 indocs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md(not a census surface, not governed), so the rewrite moves both copies in one PR; and the four internal skills are prose corpora, so their rewrites are measured against the token ratchet only where a ceiling exists.The dev's second out-of-scope finding —
dogfood-verification/SKILL.md:135–137instructs the executor togh pr merge --squash --auto --delete-branchandgit worktree remove … --force, againstos-dev.mdrule 4 (never merge anything) and its resource rule (never--forceup front) — is a live contradiction outside this census's form and is filed by the seat as its own card after a dedup with a positive control (no prior card names it).Generated by Claude Code
os-steve commentedon Sep 5, 2026
Re-anchored by the skills seat: members 3 and 5 of the family have landed (PR #15641 MERGED 15:38Z, PR #15856 MERGED 13:48Z), so the family gate this card waited on is open. The rewrite half is held one step longer because its four hits sit in files still moving:
.claude/agents/os-dev.md(PR #15923, in the merge queue) and.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(#15929, the maintainer's 插队, in flight). Dispatching the rewrites on top of those would race two governed files at their ceilings.Blocked-by: #15929
When #15929's PR lands, the rewrite half is dispatched as one flight with the family's re-lock pass (ceilings re-pinned at landed counts, the retirement playbook's table pin 328 → 326), one PR per governed surface, shrink-or-neutral under both ratchets, the
checklist-testhit moving with its RUNNER.md twin.Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 6, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 8 — the REWRITE HALF (deliverable 2) plus the corpus programme's re-lock pass, one flight: the census's hits outside SKILL.md made executable (allow-with-trace or forbid), one PR per governed surface as the disposition ruled; folded under the five-gate test with #15959 (os-dev.md's ratchet clause gains the measurement-first exception), #15975's os-dev.md line (the dev hangs the PR-side
needs:contract-reviewat creation and reports--pair N), and #15957 (the retirement playbook's table pin 328 → 326 — the re-lock pass). The SKILL.md hit rides flight A on the same file.Session:
session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfoxBranch:
claude/issue-14768-executable-fences-and-relock(objectstack; one PR per governed surface may mean two PRs — named in the report)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-14768Domain:
domain:skillsFile surface:
.claude/agents/os-dev.md(403/403),references/dispatch-runbook.md,.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.md+docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md(its twin),scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs(the pin row). ⛔ SKILL.md is flight A's.Container & model: M,
mode:subagent, contract tier —dispatch-gates.mjs --tier: os-dev.md hits clause ① (MANDATORY).Clause-②: no
Serial: no open PR touches these files. GOVERNED ⇒ draft PR(s), in-seat review at contract tier,
os-zhuang+hotlong, human merge,skip-changeset; at ACCEPT the seat addsneeds-user-decision+ the 维护者速读. The PR carriesFixes #14768,Fixes #15959,Fixes #15957; #15975 isRefs.Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 6, 2026
Container & model, amended by the seat at 05:0xZ: the flight was launched at the contract tier and the executor's first request was refused with HTTP 429 — the shared Fable allowance is exhausted (measured twice in one minute on this flight and its sibling). Under the measured quota exemption of the model-tiering ruling (fable unavailable ⇒ opus, never lower; the seat's contract-tier review compensates), the same brief is relaunched on opus; the branch, worktree and every ruling are unchanged. This note is the exemption's record.
Timestamp correction (seat, 14:2xZ): the two 429 refusals were measured at 05:01Z and 05:02Z; this note was posted at 14:05Z, after the seat's own turns had been refused on the same limit from 05:34Z to 12:26Z and the maintainer's retry brought the session back at 14:04Z. The opus relaunch happened at 14:06Z, not 05:0xZ.
Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 6, 2026
os-dev-report
Flight A member — full report on #16004 (this flight primary).
SKILL.md hit only (census hit 3; this PR is
Refs, notFixes— the other three hits ride flight B). Line 543 carried the unexecutable 「报备后」 sequencing; rewritten in place, 1:1, to the allow-with-trace form: fix on the producer side and report the landing point, never a consumer-side patch.Draft PR: #16339 (head
d88c29c76a). Both edited files are LINE-NEUTRAL: SKILL.md 811/811 with table pin 342 untouched,references/core-rules.md150/150. Gate union re-derived and run at that head: 16 of 16 derived commands green,--ranreconciled 16 run / 0 unrun; whole-repopnpm lintexit 0;check-governed-merges --testexit 3 GOVERNED.CI: converged green on this head — 29 of 29 check runs completed, 17 success / 12 skipped / 0 failures.
Generated by Claude Code
claude commentedon Sep 6, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 14768, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-14768-executable-fences-and-relock", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/16357", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Rewrite half of the census, plus the folded cards, in one governed PR (draft, one regime). The three hits outside pm-dispatch/SKILL.md became executable: os-dev.md's 「去问」 is now forbid plus a terminal route (never correct another actor's PR state; the question goes in the report, `blocked` where it blocks the work); dispatch-runbook.md's verbatim dispatch-word sentence became allow-with-trace (fix at the producer directly, landing point and reasoning into the report and the PR body — the 「报备后」 sequencing is gone); checklist-test/SKILL.md's strong form 「停下等维护者」 became the run ending with that report, moved in lockstep with its docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md rule-2 twin. Two more clauses land on os-dev.md at 403/403 line-neutral: the ruled measurement-first exception for a zero-headroom governed ledger, and the clause-2 carrier line (hang needs:contract-review on the PR in the same write that opens it, report the --pair exit). Both are paid for by NAMED deleted rationale — two why-clauses in the ratchet block and the squash-concatenation sentence — never by re-wrap, so the 2026-08-17 筹行 ban holds. The re-lock pass lowers the retirement playbook's max-table-row-bytes pin 328 to 326; the ratchet now prints zero advisories. One dispatch mechanism assumption is FALSIFIED and was not relied on: check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs does not cover .claude/skills/** at all (its population is the published skills/ catalog), so checklist-test/SKILL.md is governed by the LINE ratchet (234 lines, ceiling 238) — it came in line-neutral regardless, and the token ratchet was run anyway, self-test and live, both green.", "tests": "All at the final head f5c08e9589 (after merging origin/main 3e270d4e29), every exit code redirected-then-captured, every verdict quoted from the gate's own line. (1) Derived family: `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` over the five-path change set = 39 families; all 39 run; `--ran` reconciliation prints \"39 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 39 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED\" and \"39 derived, 39 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN\". Derivation at the pre-merge and post-merge heads was byte-identical (39 commands, diff empty). (2) Line ratchet, live: \".claude/agents/os-dev.md is 403 lines (ceiling 403; headroom 0).\" / \"dispatch-runbook.md is 241 lines (ceiling 241; headroom 0).\" / \"checklist-test/SKILL.md is 234 lines (ceiling 238; headroom 4).\" / \"spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md: widest table row is 326 bytes (pin 326; headroom 0).\" Advisory count after the pin move: 0 (grep -c on the run log; it was 1 before). Self-test green via `pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet`. (3) Token ratchet: --self-test and live both exit 0. (4) `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --test` over the five paths: exit 3, GOVERNED, one regime named (.claude/** x3), \"paths not on the register: docs/qa/platform-checklist/RUNNER.md, scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs\" — so one PR, not two; --self-test exit 0 (274 assertions). (5) check-half-states --self-test exit 0, and every rewritten AND deleted sentence grepped over scripts/, .github/, packages/, docs/ in both old and new spellings: no pin names any of them. (6) All five .claude/hooks/*.selftest.sh exit 0. (7) Whole-repo `pnpm lint` (eslint . --no-inline-config) through scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-14768: \"VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 111s\" — whole-repo, NOT narrowed, so no narrowing declaration is owed. (8) One gate answered exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET on the first pass (@objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions, missing @objectstack/formula dist) — read as NOT MEASURED, not as red; cleared with `turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` through the lock, then re-run: exit 0. (9) CI on the PR head f5c08e9589, polled in the foreground to completion: 34 check runs, 23 success / 11 skipped / 0 failing — Lint & Repo Gates success, TypeScript Type Check success, Test Core (all 6 shards) success, Dogfood Regression Gate success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Check Changeset success. No ablation applies to this card (no executable subject); the on-disk proof used instead was per-edit anchor counting: every deleted phrase greps to 0 and every injected phrase to 1, plus a byte-identity check (git hash-object on all five files, before and after replaying the patch onto current main: identical).", "mcp_calls": "1 — the create_pull_request write. Every GitHub read went through unauthenticated repo-scoped REST (probe 200) and git; the label write and the four report comments are REST POSTs.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "The PM-side summary row for the ratchet rules in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md states the currency rules but not the new measurement-first exception. Should it carry the exception too?", "options": [ "A — leave it: the exception is dev-side, the PM row is a summary, and check:skill-frame-sync is green (it is not a COPIES mirror), so nothing is mechanically owed", "B — add the exception clause to that row in the SKILL.md flight (or a follow-up), so a PM reading only its own file does not brief the opposite of what the dev definition now allows" ], "recommendation": "A now, B as a cheap rider if the SKILL.md flight still has line budget. The exception fires only when the DISPATCH already names measurement-first, so the PM is by construction the party that knows about it; the risk of divergence is real but one-directional and small, and buying a line on a zero-headroom governed file to restate a rule the PM authors is worse value than the drift it prevents. This PR did not touch SKILL.md because that file is another flight's this round." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "not filed (already fixed on main) — the census's second finding, dogfood-verification/SKILL.md instructing `gh pr merge --squash --auto` against the never-merge rule, no longer exists: that line now reads the correct `git worktree remove` rule without --force. Verified by grep on current main; no card is owed.", "not filed (a reading, not a defect) — the dispatch's mechanism note that checklist-test/SKILL.md is governed by check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs is wrong; that gate's population is the published skills/ root only. Recorded here and in the PR body so the next brief does not repeat it." ] }Generated by Claude Code