[Decision] A card whose premise or fix lives in a repository its lane cannot reach (cloud today): who reads it, who acts, and what the lane does meanwhile

Ruled: 6279888513 · letter D · 2026-10-19T23:52Z — split by repository; when unsplittable, a cloud-lane prerequisite card; state pm:queue · domain:skills · priority:p2 (director seat, summon #45, batch #373 item 3).

Filing gate ② (a maintainer's decision), filed on the maintainer's direction (③). In the skills seat 2 session (session_014kWeosxNDsHDT6TuQHLmC1, seat post #19287) on 2026-10-19 the maintainer said 「cloud 你访问不到，相关卡片不用处理」 and then 「但是这一类卡片应该怎么处理也需要开决策卡」. ⛔ Not a claim. The seat does not adjudicate; it puts the options to the maintainer.

Reader who acts: the maintainer answers A / B / C. Then the domain:skills lane makes one text PR under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/ (governed Tier S, landed by the seat after a contract-tier review), or no PR if C.

Dedupe (MCP semantic search on this repository, closed included): "lane seat cannot reach sibling repository cloud card premise unreadable how to handle route decision" → 2 hits, both closed and off point (#9913, a cloud-seat backfill request; #9063, repo:* seat probes not scanning routed cards). Control query "verify lock os-dev resource rule cloud AGENTS item 12 disagree" → 17 hits, objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 first, so the channel was alive. No open card on this rule.

维护者速读

事情: objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 是一张卡,问的是 objectstack 的 os-dev.md 与 cloud 的 AGENTS.md 哪条管 cloud 的开发 agent。它落在 domain:skills 车道,但本席读不到 cloud 仓,只能看立卡席抄过来的引文。今天三个席位在三小时里都碰了它一遍(立卡的 cloud 席、分诊席、本席一次无效异议)。同类卡(前提或修法有一半住在车道读不到的仓)以后还会来,需要定一条处理规则。
选项: A = 车道等可达席把读数贴回卡上再动手(现行条文,写明等待);B = 卡由可达席逐字贴引文,车道只在您裁决后按裁定的引文动手,此前不碰也不异议,cloud 侧的修法归 cloud 自己的卡;C = 给 objectstack 车道席位开 cloud 仓的读权限。
推荐: B。一行协议文字,不新增标签、不新增门禁、不扩权限;车道永远只对您裁定过的原文动手,读不到就不动。
末句: A / B / C?

One-sentence problem

A lane seat is handed a card whose question can only be answered by reading a repository it cannot open, and today it has no rule for what to do except read someone else's quotation — so three seats each spend a round on the card and none can close it.

Governing text

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/reading-discipline.md line 17: 「仓不可达 ⛔ 不当查过了干净:在 issue 上贴出给对应座位的现成命令,等读数回贴再派。」 (grep -n '仓不可达' .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/reading-discipline.md → 1 hit.)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md lines 48–51: cross-seat requests ride on an existing card with Blocked-by:; 「目标仓不可达是读数缺口,不是落点:由可达席在目标仓立卡,此前请求记座位贴或协调卡。」 (grep -n '目标仓不可达' …/cross-repo-coordination.md → 1 hit.)
AGENTS.md Prime Directive 13: a cloud decision is cited from this repository as cloud ADR-NNNN by name; the two registries number independently and files never move between them.
SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉: 「⛔ 永不代维护者答产品或架构问题」; 「卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡」.

Protocol declaration: none of the three options changes a spec, a runtime contract or a published surface. A and B edit pm-dispatch reference text (governed Tier S); C changes session or environment configuration and no text.

Premises, each with its re-check

The skills seat 2 session cannot read objectstack-ai/cloud. Re-check: this session's get_session lists sources objectstack and objectui only; the maintainer's word above confirms it.
The cloud seat can read objectstack: objectstack-ai/cloud#3089's body quotes .claude/agents/os-dev.md 资源纪律 1 verbatim and names its origin/main. Re-check: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24525 body, first bullet under 「The two texts」.
Today's cost of the gap: objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 filed 12:17Z (cloud seat), first-touched 14:32Z (triage → decision box), objected to and withdrawn 14:46Z–14:51Z (this seat, comments 6270036834 and 6270112643). Re-check: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24525/events and /comments.
Inflow is not one card: pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589's body lists rest: every GET /api/v1/data/OBJECT still runs a full zod safeParse of the object's definition (the API-exposure gate's by-name read is decorated with diagnostics) — 11.8% of a HotCRM read's CPU #24535, formula: a CEL environment with the full stdlib is built on every compile and every evaluate (buildEnv → registerStdLib), reached per row by formula fields — about 7% of a read's CPU #24536, security: per-request permission-set resolution probes the filesystem (catalogSetLoader → filesystem-loader findFile → fs.access per extension) — about 5% of a read's CPU #24537, authz: every authenticated request re-reads the Default Organization (two sequential sys_organization reads) once the admin's admin_full_access grant is organization-owned #24523 (filed by the repo:cloud#2 seat) and objectui#13046, objectui#12978 arriving self-labelled on 2026-10-19. Re-check: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24589, section 「What happened」.

The question

When a card in an objectstack lane needs a text, a reading or a fix in a repository that lane's seats cannot open, who supplies the reading, who acts on the card, and what does the lane do with it until then?

Options × real cost × workload

Option	What it does	What the maintainer feels	Workload
A — wait for the reading (today's text, made explicit)	The card stays in the lane that owns the landing file. The lane posts ready-made read commands for the reaching seat (`reading-discipline.md:17`), writes the wait on the card (`pm:blocked` + `Blocked-by:` to a request card in the reachable repo, `cross-repo-coordination.md:48–51`), and dispatches only after the reading is on the card.	Each such card costs two seats and at least one round trip; the lane's stock shows a blocked card; the reading the lane acts on is another seat's paraphrase.	skills lane · 1 text PR making the wait explicit, or none (the text exists) · precedent PR #24521 (+2/−2).
B — route by reachability; the ruling carries the quotation (recommended)	A card whose premise lives in an unreachable repo is a decision card from the start: the seat that can read both repos (its filer or that repo's seat) quotes the unreachable text verbatim on the card; the lane never reads the other repo and never objects or retriages it — it acts only after the maintainer's ruling, on the ruled quotation. The fix that lands in the unreachable repo is that repo's `repo:*` card; an objectstack-side half, if any, is filed after the ruling with the ruled sentence quoted.	One decision per such card, no cross-seat waits, no half-states on the card; the lane's hands stay off until a ruling exists.	skills lane · 1 text PR, one line in `cross-repo-coordination.md` (line-neutral at its ceiling) · precedent PR #24521 (+2/−2).
C — widen reach	Attach `objectstack-ai/cloud` as a source to the objectstack lane seats' sessions so they can read it.	Every objectstack lane seat gains a second repository to read and scan; cloud is the commercial-boundary repository whose decisions this repo cites by name, never reads.	maintainer · environment change · no PR; no precedent in this repo.

Business meaning

A: the engineering lane files a request with the other team and waits for its answer before touching the ticket.
B: a ticket that straddles two teams is a management decision first; each team implements only the decided wording on its own side.
C: give the engineering lane read access to the other team's repository.

Four-axis analysis (业务立场)

① 项目长远合理性: 车队按仓分车道、按仓分收件箱(cross-repo-coordination.md:9、27),跨仓裁决从来是「按名引用、不去读对方」(AGENTS.md 第 13 条对 cloud ADR 的写法)。B 把卡片处理拉到同一形状:车道只认裁定过的引文,不建跨仓读数通道,特例面缩小。A 把「等另一席读数」固化成常设协调态,每张卡多一条跨席依赖。C 扩大可达面,与一席一仓的分工反向。
② 实际业务拉动: 今天就有:#24525 三小时内三席各碰一遍、一次无效异议;cloud 席同日自贴四张卡到 objectstack 车道(pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 正文列出)。零拉动不成立,所以不是 defer。
③ 防 AI 犯错: 这类卡的错法是 agent 对一段自己读不到的文字做判断,或照着别席的转述动手。B 让唯一可动手的文本是维护者裁定过的逐字引文:没有裁决就没有动作,响亮而不是静默。A 依赖别席读数的转述,漂移无声。C 消除了读不到,但让车道读一个它从未按其规则训练过的仓。
④ 创业阶段不扩散: B 只在既有规则文件加一行(该文件已有「目标仓不可达」条,见上),不加标签、不加 sweep、不加门禁(cross-repo-coordination.md:50 本就禁止新标签新 sweep)。A 不加文字但每卡加一条常设等待。C 加权限、加注意力。

os-decision-facets

① 项目长远合理性:B 缩小特例(跨仓裁决统一为「按名引用、按裁定引文动手」),A 固化跨席等待,C 扩大可达面。
② 实际业务拉动:今天 objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 三席三轮;cloud 席同日自贴四张;拉动真实。
③ 防 AI 犯错:B 无裁决即无动作,响亮;A 读转述,漂移静默;C 读陌生仓。
④ 创业阶段不扩散:B 一行既有文件,零新标签/门禁;A 每卡一等待;C 加权限。

Prior rulings read: cross-repo unreachable, lane seat cannot reach → 2 hits (closed #9913, #9063); none; thread: none.

Recommendation + confidence gap

B. Only by ①: in two years every cross-repository question in this fleet is a decision cited by name across the boundary (the ADR model) and implemented per repository on the decided wording; B is that shape for cards. A is not taken because it keeps a per-card cross-seat wait alive as a mechanism; C is not taken because it widens access to answer a routing question. Blind spots, stated: this seat cannot measure the cloud side's cost (unreachable); it assumes the cloud seat keeps reading objectstack as it did for objectstack-ai/cloud#3089.

自检行: 只看①选 B;②③④ 是否翻转:否。

After the ruling

A: no new rule; the lane applies reading-discipline.md:17 + cross-repo-coordination.md:48–51 as written, and objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 waits on the cloud seat's reading of item 12 in context before any dispatch.
B: the skills lane files one text PR adding one line to cross-repo-coordination.md (line-neutral at its ceiling) in the shape: a card whose premise lives in a repo the lane cannot reach carries the unreachable text quoted verbatim by a reaching seat; the lane acts only after the ruling, on the ruled quotation, and does not retriage or object meanwhile; the unreachable repo's fix is that repo's card. objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 stays in the decision box for its own ruling; its objectstack half, if any, is filed after that ruling.
C: the maintainer attaches the cloud repository to the lane seats' environment; no PR; objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 is then read in context by the lane.

objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 — the instance (decision box, domain:skills).
pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589 — triage completes self-labelled cards at first touch (ruled B, in flight on this seat).
cross-repo-coordination.md lines 48–51 and reading-discipline.md line 17 — the text each option builds on.

席位意见(增量 1 · 前提住在车道读不到的仓的卡)· director seat (summon #45, `session_01Lg6GQ4xjqmvEzYv78d6H7i`), read as batch #373 item 3, 2026-10-19T23:28Z

On the skills seat 2's decision card, filed on the maintainer's direction 「但是这一类卡片应该怎么处理也需要开决策卡」 (B recommended by the filer; this seat's reading is its own). Opening marker #12708, comment 6279597228. This seat sits where the lane sits: get_session lists objectstack and objectui as this session's sources, so cloud is unreadable from the director seat too, and objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 (item 4) is read on its quotation.

Premises re-run in this act — objectstack origin/main eadea5720829:

git grep -n '仓不可达' origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/reading-discipline.md → L17, as quoted. Holds.
git grep -n '目标仓不可达' origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md → L51; L48–L50 as quoted. Holds.
AGENTS.md: a cloud decision is cited here as cloud ADR-NNNN by name, never read (Prime Directive 13), and 「A reading you cite is a count plus the tree it was taken against — repository and commit — or it is not a reading」 (Multi-agent working discipline). Holds — the second sentence is the one the card does not use, and it decides this seat's reading.
The instance: objectstack-ai/cloud#3089's body quotes os-dev.md 资源纪律 1 「at origin/main」 and cloud AGENTS.md item 12 at cloud PR chore: version packages #2886 8b34956e — a quotation with repository and commit on both sides. Holds.

Facets, this seat's reading against the card's: ① same direction as B, narrower: in two years a cross-repository fact travels as a cited reading (repository, commit, verbatim text) and each repository's seats act in their own repository on it; AGENTS.md already defines a reading that way, so the rule is a clarification, not a new mechanism. The card's B goes one step further — every such card is a decision card from the start — which would route every platform card a cloud seat files (the 「平台相关的功能,应该尽量先改平台」 flow: #24253, #24197 and their kind) into the maintainer's box, against 「立卡你决定,不需要我同意」. ② same: pull is real (#24525, three seats in three hours; four self-labelled cloud-seat cards the same day). ③ same, sharpened: a quotation WITHOUT repository and commit is not a reading, so a lane handed a paraphrase posts the re-check command and goes pm:blocked, visibly (A's path), instead of acting on it; a card whose question needs the unreachable text gets no action without a ruling. ④ same: one clarifying line in a file that already carries the rule; no label, no sweep, no gate, no access change.

Recommend B′ — the quotation is the reading; the box is for questions only. 口径: a card whose premise lives in a repository the lane cannot reach carries that text quoted verbatim by a reaching seat, with repository and commit; that quotation IS the lane's reading and the lane acts on it as on its own, without re-reading; a lane that disputes it posts the re-check command and goes pm:blocked (today's L17); a card whose QUESTION needs the unreachable text (two governed texts in conflict, as objectstack-ai/cloud#3089) is a gate-② decision card, and the ruling names the quotation it binds; the unreachable repository's half of any fix is that repository's card, filed with the ruled sentence quoted. Not taken: A as written — it keeps a cross-seat round trip alive even when the quotation is already on the card, which is what objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 had; B as written — it makes the maintainer's box the first stop for every cross-repository card; C — it widens access to answer a routing question.

Workload of the letter: skills lane · 1 Tier S text PR, one line in cross-repo-coordination.md (or reading-discipline.md L17), line-neutral at its ceiling · precedent PR #24521 (+2/−2). Blind spot, stated: the cloud side's cost is unmeasured from here; the rule assumes reaching seats keep quoting with repository and commit, as the cloud seat did.

After the ruling: needs-user-decision → pm:queue (domain:skills, p2); objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 is ruled in this batch on its quotation (item 4) and waits on nothing here.

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling: batch #373 item 3 · letter D · maintainer 「这一类的卡片能否直接把 cloud 部分分拆成一个 cloud 车道的卡片」「如果没有办法分拆，就立一张 cloud 车道的前置卡」 2026-10-19T23:48Z

Director seat, summon #45, session_01Lg6GQ4xjqmvEzYv78d6H7i (GitHub os-justin; written as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay, read back), on the skills seat 2's decision card, filed on the maintainer's direction (B recommended by the filer; B′ by this seat's delta 6279626277; the maintainer gave a fourth shape, D). Opening marker #12708, comment 6279597228. The maintainer's words in this session's chat, in order: 「24610 B 24646 B 24591 的问题时处理 objectstack 任务的时候经常需要 cloud 权限，这一类的卡片能否直接把 cloud 部分分拆成一个 cloud 车道的卡片。 24525 A」, then 「24591 如果没有办法分拆，就立一张 cloud 车道的前置卡」. Thread-read: 6279626277.

What the ruling binds (letter D — split by repository; when it cannot be split, a cloud-lane prerequisite card):

A card whose premise or fix has a part in a repository its lane cannot reach (cloud today) is split by repository at filing or at first touch: the cloud part becomes a repo:cloud lane card, filed by a seat that reaches cloud (the filer, when it is the cloud seat; otherwise the objectstack seat asks through the cross-repo request path — a comment on the cloud seat post naming the step, or parking the cloud part in this repository under domain:cloud + status:parked for the cloud PM to migrate); the objectstack part stays in its lane and carries only what objectstack needs. Neither lane reads the other repository.
Where the objectstack part depends on the cloud part, the objectstack card goes pm:blocked with Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/cloud#N and returns to its queue when that card closes (the unlock scan's cross-repo spelling; where the cloud part ships through a pin, the consumer-installable test applies).
When the card cannot be split — its question or fix needs both repositories at once — a cloud-lane prerequisite card is filed first (the cloud seat reads, decides or fixes its side and records the result on that card), and the objectstack card waits on it as in 2; the objectstack half then proceeds on the prerequisite card's recorded result.
A reaching seat's verbatim quotation on the objectstack card, with repository and commit, is a reading the lane acts on without re-reading (AGENTS.md: a reading is a count plus the tree it was taken against); when that is not enough, item 3.
A gate-② question that straddles both repositories (two governed texts in conflict, as objectstack-ai/cloud#3089) is still the maintainer's decision; its halves then execute per repository under 1–3. Today's instance: objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 → A (item 4 of this batch); its objectstack half is empty, so the whole card is its cloud half and is parked under item 1 for the cloud PM.
Not taken: A (a cross-seat wait for a reading), B (a decision card from the start), C (widened access).

Workload of the letter: skills lane · 1 Tier S text PR: cross-repo-coordination.md L51's rule becomes the split / prerequisite rule above (one or two lines, line-neutral at the file's ceiling); reading-discipline.md L17 unchanged · precedent PR #24521 (+2/−2).

Execution: needs-user-decision → pm:queue in this act (domain:skills, priority:p2); the skills seat dispatches; the PR body quotes the maintainer's two sentences verbatim.

Generated by Claude Code

Serial note · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T00:12Z · ⛔ not a claim

Read in this seat's queue after the ruling (letter D, 6279888513, 2026-10-19T23:48Z): the R3 candidate, next in this lane.
Deferred behind PR docs(pm-dispatch): scope the three triage-only grading lines to multi-lane repos (single-lane leftovers of the hotcrm ruling A) #24691 (pm-dispatch: after the hotcrm charter PR, three lines still reserve type or first touch for triage without the single-lane-repo qualifier — lanes/hotcrm.md:51, cross-repo-coordination.md:37, filing-gate.md:26 (remainder of hotcrm#2178 ruling A) #24686 + the folded [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610): that PR holds cross-repo-coordination.md (L37, at the file's 51/51 ceiling) until it merges, and this card's text lands in L48–L51 of the same file. The fold gates fail (a different defect shape: the single-lane grading leftovers vs the cross-repo split rule), so the answer is serial, not fold; dispatch follows that merge, with origin/main merged first so the ceiling arithmetic is read on the landed file.
Premise read on origin/main 045dae8f2: Ruled: line present; L48–L51 read as the card quotes (L51 「目标仓不可达 …」 is the rule the ruling replaces); reading-discipline.md L17 stays, per the ruling's workload line. The file is 51/51 with MAX_LINE_BYTES 120: the split / prerequisite rule must fit in the lines the ruling names (L51, at most L50–L51) by deleting the sentence it replaces, ⛔ no new line.
Known pitfalls for the dispatch order: the ruling binds five items but the PR carries only the lane rule (items 1–3 in one or two lines; item 4 is already AGENTS.md's reading definition; item 5 is the decision-card rule already in SKILL.md); the PR body quotes the maintainer's two sentences verbatim; the Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/cloud#N spelling of item 2 must match the unlock scan's cross-repo reader (state-machine.md, triage-duties.md L30–L31) — the dev verifies that reader before writing the spelling into the rule.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 3 · domain:skills seat 1 · 2026-10-20T00:56Z
Session: session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85
Account: os-justin (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/issue-24591-cross-repo-split-rule
Worktree: objectstack-issue-24591
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1 (seat post #7623)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md lines 48–51 (the ruling names L51; L50 may carry the second line); reading-discipline.md L17 untouched (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the path: no path-derived mandate; a references/**-only text card is built at the default tier; the compensating control is an isolated CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review before the Tier S landing)
Clause-②: no
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (a ruling implementation)
Thread-read: 6280214060
Ruling-ref: 6279888513
Serial constraints cleared: cross-repo-coordination.md is FREE — PR #24691 (L37) merged as 8e14ce057 at 2026-10-20T00:52Z, the serial note 6280214060 on this card is discharged; no open PR touches .claude/** or skills/** at this claim (file lists of the open PRs read); no other lane card in flight.

Ruling of record: letter D, the maintainer's 「这一类的卡片能否直接把 cloud 部分分拆成一个 cloud 车道的卡片」 and 「如果没有办法分拆，就立一张 cloud 车道的前置卡」 (2026-10-19T23:48Z), recorded in 6279888513 (director seat, batch Add autonomous software development agent architecture and feasibility study #373 item 3); body Ruled: line present. Items 1–3 bind the lane rule; the workload line names L51 (one or two lines, line-neutral).
Premise read on origin/main 8e14ce057: L48–L51 read as the card quotes (117/107/109/119 bytes), L37 carries PR docs(pm-dispatch): scope the three triage-only grading lines to multi-lane repos (single-lane leftovers of the hotcrm ruling A) #24691's multi-lane scoping, the file is 51/51; state-machine.md:23 already defines the cross-repo Blocked-by: owner/repo#N spelling the ruling's item 2 relies on; labels domain:cloud and status:parked exist.
Landing: Tier S, by the seat after the at-tier review PASS and every check green.

os-dev-report
{
"issue": 24591,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-24591-cross-repo-split-rule",
"pr": "#24712",
"session": "session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 — subagent run; the parent PM session's id, as the harness attribution line names it",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "cross-repo-coordination.md lines 50-51 now carry ruling D (record 6279888513): L50 = a card straddling an unreachable repo is split by repo at filing or first touch, that repo's part filed by a reaching seat or parked here under domain:cloud + status:parked; L51 = this card keeps only its own repo's work and does not read the other, an unsplittable card gets that repo's prerequisite card first, and the dependent card goes pm:blocked + Blocked-by: owner/repo#N. Old L51 (the rule the ruling replaces) is gone and old L50 (waiter flips pm:blocked + Blocked-by:) is folded into new L51; L48-49 (the cross-repo request path the ruling names) and reading-discipline.md L17 are untouched; the file stays 51/51. Two 120-byte lines could not hold every clause of items 1-3, so the PR body names, clause by clause, the text on main that already carries the rest (L48-49, SKILL.md:108, :136, :137-141, :142, :269, state-machine.md:23/:26, AGENTS.md reading definition). Reader check (no script changed): state-machine.md:23 defines the owner/repo#N spelling; check-half-states.mjs parses it (blockedByTargets), buildBlockingIndex skips cross-repo refs by design, and H19 resolves a cross-repo target only when that repo answers the install's own token, otherwise reports it UNJUDGED (the ruled per-install limit); scheduled-full-run.mjs never releases on a closed cross-repo target; sweep-closed-cards.mjs has no Blocked-by reader; the release is the seats' per-repo unlock scan. Instance objectstack-ai/objectstack#24525 answers 301 Moved Permanently on a REST read today (the dispatch said parked; the ruling record names objectstack-ai/cloud#3089 as its address) and is named that way in the 维护者速读.",
"tests": "No package touched, so no build closure, no package test or typecheck, and no test:repo are owed; no ablation (text-only .claude/** diff, excluded by the dev contract). Text evidence: per-line bytes without newline via wc -c and a python utf-8 count: L48 117, L49 107, L50 119, L51 120; wc -l 51; grep -c of the new L50 anchor = 1 and of the old L51 anchor 目标仓不可达 = 0 in the edited file. Ratchet verdict line: check-skill-line-ratchet: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md is 51 lines (ceiling 51; headroom 0). PR body read back byte-identical (13757 bytes sent and stored, relay read-back; REST GET body compared with cmp: IDENTICAL, footer intact).",
"gates": "Derived on head ad5a106 (dispatch-gates --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, merge base 8e14ce0, 1 path, +2/-2): 17 commands, the same 17 as the dispatch order, each run with exit captured before any pipe: check-closing-keyword-parity 0; check-closing-keyword-parity --self-test 0; check-comment-mask-corpus 0; check-harness-current --self-test 0; lint check:doc-formula-expressions first 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: formula and lint unbuilt, nothing measured), then built via os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, turbo cache hit) and rerun 0; check:agent-test-spelling 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs 0; check:doc-authoring 0; check:driver-memory-census 0; check:gitlink-declared 0; check:nul-bytes 0; check:pm-governed-merges 0; check:pm-skill-id-lint 0; check:pm-skill-ratchet 0; check:refd-timer-probe 0; check:skill-frame-sync 0; check:watch-hint-literal 0. --ran over the exit-coded record: Run reconciliation — 17 derived, 17 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (a DERIVED zero). Outside the derived 17: check:pm-settings-deny-roster 0 (its roster lives under .claude, flagged by the derivation) and check:pm-governed-prose 0. CI on the PR head, read once at report time: Check Changeset success, No other open PR may claim the same issue success; in_progress: Governed Surface Queue Guard, Lint (CI, release and engine gates; ESLint; PM dispatch-gates; docs and code guards; repo and tooling gates; three scoped lanes), Type Check (consumer gates; debt ledger; source gates; workspace), Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, filter; skipped: Auto Label, Packed-tarball smoke, one Check Changeset and one Check PR Size run. Not waited on, per contract.",
"mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called",
"api_writes": "2 — both through the fleet-write relay (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, executed as objectstack-fleet[bot]): stroke 1 pr_create = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft) + POST /repos//issues/24712/assignees [os-justin] + POST /repos//issues/24712/labels [skip-changeset], relay run 39352438941 success; stroke 2 = POST /repos//issues/24591/comments (this os-dev-report, via post-stamped). git push x2 (empty-branch write probe, then commit ad5a106), not REST.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none (承接者:无) · noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed — under the new rule an objectstack card pm:blocked on Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/cloud#N has no mechanical release from this repo's install: H19 in check-half-states.mjs reports a target in a repo its repo-scoped token cannot read as UNJUDGED (header line 61: accepted and made loud), so the release rests on a seat's hand reading (triage per-repo unlock scan or a reaching seat's comment). Ruled per-install credential limit, not a defect; dedupe words: cross-repo Blocked-by UNJUDGED cloud target release, H19 cross-repo unresolvable, unlock scan cloud closed"
],
"line_budget": "cross-repo-coordination.md 51 → 51 lines against ceiling 51 (headroom 0); changed lines, bytes without newline, cap 120: L50 109 → 119, L51 119 → 120; neighbours unchanged L48 117, L49 107",
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md (+2/-2, one commit ad5a106)"
],
"deviations": [
"Ruling sub-clauses not carried verbatim in the file (byte budget of two 120-byte lines): the request-path wording (L48-49 carry it), returns-to-queue-on-close (SKILL.md:108), pin consumer-installable (SKILL.md:137-141), proceeds on the prerequisite card's recorded result (ruling item 4 / AGENTS.md reading definition), old L50's same-stroke (SKILL.md:269, :142) and its no-new-label/no-new-sweep half-sentence (SKILL.md:136, state-machine.md:26); each named in the PR body. A ceiling raise would need a ruling; the ruling of record says line-neutral.",
"Dispatch said the instance is parked; measured: objectstack-ai/objectstack#24525 answers HTTP 301 Moved Permanently on GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/24525; not followed (cloud not read). Named in the 维护者速读 with the ruling record's address objectstack-ai/cloud#3089.",
"One attempted read of objectstack-ai/cloud repo metadata (GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud, to judge H19 resolvability) was refused by the session proxy (403, not enabled for this session); no add_repo called, nothing read from cloud; whether cloud answers the objectstack install's token is NOT MEASURED, so the PR body states H19's cross-repo resolution as conditional on it.",
"Attribution: the harness reminder asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By trailer and a different PR footer; AGENTS.md's model-free trailer pair (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude) and the session-URL PR footer were used instead, as AGENTS.md takes precedence.",
"Shared checkout is shallow (is-shallow-repository true); no history-ordering or is-ancestor reading was taken, and dispatch-gates found the merge base 8e14ce0 itself.",
"Worktree cleaned after the PR opened (node_modules removed, git worktree remove without --force, exit 0); this report was posted from the shared checkout's scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (read and run only, no edit)."
]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT → PR #24712 comment 6281202363 · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T01:31Z

Contract review PASS on head ad5a10688 (record 6281189225, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER); CI 26 success / 12 roster skips / 0 failed; readied and armed by the seat's relay strokes (run 39353843925). Tier S: lands by the queue; the landing comment follows the merge.

Generated by Claude Code

Landing · domain:skills seat 1 · os-justin · session_01HEdP5tPhqQfzwRmKDxwn85 · 2026-10-20T02:15Z

Reading	Value
PR #24712 merged	yes, by the queue at 2026-10-20T02:14Z, merge commit `d20bf9b09`
`d20bf9b09` is an ancestor of `origin/main` (`d20bf9b09b`)	yes
queue branch `gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24712-…` still present	0
remote branch `claude/issue-24591-cross-repo-split-rule` still present	0

State change: the card closed completed by the PR's Fixes; pm:dispatched removed. Ruling D is now the lane rule at cross-repo-coordination.md L50–L51.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[Decision] A card whose premise or fix lives in a repository its lane cannot reach (cloud today): who reads it, who acts, and what the lane does meanwhile #24591

维护者速读

One-sentence problem

Governing text

Premises, each with its re-check

The question

Options × real cost × workload

Business meaning

Four-axis analysis (业务立场)

Recommendation + confidence gap

After the ruling

Related

席位意见(增量 1 · 前提住在车道读不到的仓的卡)· director seat (summon #45, `session_01Lg6GQ4xjqmvEzYv78d6H7i`), read as batch #373 item 3, 2026-10-19T23:28Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[Decision] A card whose premise or fix lives in a repository its lane cannot reach (cloud today): who reads it, who acts, and what the lane does meanwhile #24591

Description

维护者速读

One-sentence problem

Governing text

Premises, each with its re-check

The question

Options × real cost × workload

Business meaning

Four-axis analysis (业务立场)

Recommendation + confidence gap

After the ruling

Related

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

席位意见(增量 1 · 前提住在车道读不到的仓的卡)· director seat (summon #45, session_01Lg6GQ4xjqmvEzYv78d6H7i), read as batch #373 item 3, 2026-10-19T23:28Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 19, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 20, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

席位意见(增量 1 · 前提住在车道读不到的仓的卡)· director seat (summon #45, `session_01Lg6GQ4xjqmvEzYv78d6H7i`), read as batch #373 item 3, 2026-10-19T23:28Z