[objectstack-fleet]

Fixes #23934
Clause-②: no

What changed

One line of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (L268, the 「卡先于弹窗」 rule) is reworded in place. No line is added or removed, no code, no gate, no changeset (.claude/** is not published).

Before (118 bytes):

- 卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 `needs-user-decision` 卡;收件箱由维护者定期消化,⛔ 不 assign 推送。

After (118 bytes):

- 卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 `needs-user-decision` 卡;列选项等答的聊天即弹窗;⛔ 不 assign 推送。

The new middle clause names chat prose that lists options and waits for the maintainer's choice as the same channel as the AskUserQuestion widget: in both shapes the needs-user-decision card comes first (card acceptance 1). The ruling behind it is the maintainer's word quoted on the card: 「需要我决策的开决策卡」 and 「这种决策问题就是应该开决策卡，是skills 没写清楚嘛？skills也需要更新」.

Clause survival audit (every dropped clause must live elsewhere)

Clause of the old line	Disposition	Evidence at head 04e2341e1
「卡先于弹窗」 (title)	kept verbatim	L268
「需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡」	kept verbatim	L268
「收件箱由维护者定期消化」	dropped: it describes the maintainer's own cadence, not a seat duty	the inbox itself is named at L106 (needs-user-decision row: 「维护者的收件箱」); the seat-side duty is L38 (「⛔ 永不整席等维护者答复;需裁事项落卡进决策箱」); grep -n 收件箱 SKILL.md → L106, L112 remain
「⛔ 不 assign 推送」	kept verbatim: it has no other home	grep -rn "assign 推送" .claude/ AGENTS.md → L268 only, before and after

Measurements (PM assumptions re-measured on the base)

• Base: origin/main 6d1660dc3 (moved from the order's 161aee10 while the worktree was created; SKILL.md last touched on main by f7e836da1, unchanged between the two).
• SKILL.md: 319 lines before, 319 after (CEILINGS 319, headroom 0). L268: 118 bytes before, 118 after (MAX_LINE_BYTES 120). L270 (AskUserQuestion accelerator) untouched at 113 bytes.
• Four-axis frame block L241–261: md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0 before and after (L268 is outside it).
• references/decision-analysis.md (50/50) untouched: the in-place reword held every surviving clause within 120 bytes, so the fallback route was not needed.
• Control-byte scan over the edited file: 0 hits.

Verification at head 04e2341e1 (git rev-parse --short HEAD of the run)

Local subset, each exit code captured before any pipe (output redirected to a log, $? read next):

Command	Exit	Judgement line
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet	0	✓ check-skill-line-ratchet: declared cross-file moves: 2, total ceilings down 486 lines.
pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint	0	✓ check-skill-id-lint: 87 file(s) clean (pattern /#[0-9]{3,}/g).
pnpm check:pm-governed-prose	0	✓ check-governed-prose: 2 instruction surface(s) name all 7 registered governed surfaces …
pnpm check:skill-frame-sync	0	✓ check-skill-frame-sync: the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent
pnpm check:skill-frame-freshness (local-only)	0	✓ check-skill-frame-freshness: the decision frame in this tree is current with origin/main (fetched just now).
pnpm check:nul-bytes	0	check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 11841 text file(s) …; no raw ASCII control bytes).

Derivation: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths; change set from the merge base 6d1660dc3): 20 commands. All 20 were run with the tool's own capture idiom (eval "$cmd" > log 2>&1; status=$?, recorded as cmd :: exit N): the four above plus check:nul-bytes, and node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs (+ --self-test), node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs, node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test, node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test, pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions, pnpm check:agent-test-spelling, pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs, pnpm check:doc-authoring, pnpm check:driver-memory-census, pnpm check:gitlink-declared, pnpm check:pm-expected-skips, pnpm check:pm-governed-merges, pnpm check:refd-timer-probe, pnpm check:watch-hint-literal — every one exit 0. check:doc-formula-expressions first answered exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint not built); after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint under os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 119 s) it was re-run and exited 0. Reconciliation: dispatch-gates --ran → ✓ 20 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED; check:skill-frame-freshness is listed as outside the derivation (local-only, by design). The artifact-roster families, the type-check lanes and the always-runs tail are CI's: the seat reads them from this PR's check-runs. No package source was touched, so there is no ① build closure and no ② package test.

No ablation: the diff changes instruction text, not tested behaviour.

Acceptance notes

• Nothing out of scope was found. The only observation is the moved base (161aee10 → 6d1660dc3), which did not touch the edited file.
• .claude/** is unpublished: skip-changeset applies (requested through scripts/pm/label-write.mjs; the report says whether it landed).
• Governed surface, Tier S (.claude/**): this PR stays draft; the owning seat's contract-tier review record lands it. Draft is no barrier by itself — the directive is.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:pm-dispatch 技能的「卡先于弹窗」那一行原地改写:把「收件箱由维护者定期消化」换成「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」。行数 319 不变,该行 118 字节不变,不加任何新门禁,不动代码。

为什么改:今天有执行席把两件产品决策以「聊天里列 A/B/C 等你选」的方式提给你,没有先开 needs-user-decision 卡。你的原话是「需要我决策的开决策卡」「这种决策问题就是应该开决策卡,是skills 没写清楚嘛?skills也需要更新」。原规则只写了「弹窗」,席位把它读成仅指 AskUserQuestion 控件,所以聊天列选项等答成了漏洞。现在这行把两种形态点明为同一通道:先落卡,聊天只递卡链。

风险与代价(含回滚):只改一行协议文字,无运行时影响、无发布面。被删掉的「收件箱由维护者定期消化」只描述你自己的消化节奏,席位侧的「不等答复、落卡进决策箱」(L38)与「维护者的收件箱」(L106)仍在;「⛔ 不 assign 推送」原样保留。回滚 = revert 这一个 commit。四项验收门禁本地全部退出 0。

席位意见:(席位填写)

你要做的:无需你点击。这是 Tier S(.claude/**)受管面,由席位做达档复核并落地;若你不同意「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」这一措辞,在本 PR 评论一句即可。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: 04e2341e10e43b5f19caae968135e67220b83b35
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md + none (the hunk's claims are about other lines of the same file: L38, L106, L270, and the four-axis block L241–261, all read at the head and at origin/main 697301491)

Read 2026-10-17T12:56Z in seat by session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q (marchtian, domain:skills#1), whose served model is the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER value (get_session last_served_model). Inputs: card #23934 (body + 5 comments: 6217314283, 6217780898, 6217795279, 6218172858, 6218243991), PR #23969 (body, 1-file list, diff +1/−1 against merge base 6d1660dc3), the head's check-runs, and origin/main 697301491 for drift. Read-only: nothing built, run or re-run; the dev's local gate runs are cited as its evidence, not repeated.

① Derived judgments

The accept-set change the diff implies — one line of governed rule text, no code. L268 of SKILL.md before: 「- 卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡;收件箱由维护者定期消化,⛔ 不 assign 推送。」 (118 bytes). After: 「- 卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡;列选项等答的聊天即弹窗;⛔ 不 assign 推送。」 (118 bytes, measured by the dev at the head; the seat's own pre-dispatch measurement of the same candidate read 118). Judged clause by clause:

• 「卡先于弹窗:需裁决先落 needs-user-decision 卡」 — kept verbatim. The card-first rule the maintainer's words demand (「这种决策问题就是应该开决策卡」).
• 「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」 — right, and it is the card's acceptance 1. The card's Target: any ask that waits for the maintainer to choose, whether a widget or chat prose that lists options, lands as a card first. The new clause names chat prose that lists options and waits as the popup's channel, so L268's 「弹窗」 now covers both shapes; L270 (AskUserQuestion as the in-presence accelerator, 113 bytes, untouched) keeps governing WHEN the accelerator may fire. The two lines do not conflict: L268 says which channel comes first, L270 says when the second channel is open at all.
• 「⛔ 不 assign 推送」 — kept verbatim, and rightly: git grep -n "assign 推送" origin/main -- .claude AGENTS.md hits L268 only, so dropping it would have lost a prohibition with no other home.
• 「收件箱由维护者定期消化」 — dropped; survival verified. The inbox is named at L106 (the needs-user-decision state row, 「维护者的收件箱」) and L112; the seat-side consequence is the red line L38 (「⛔ 永不整席等维护者答复;需裁事项落卡进决策箱,队列其余照常消化」). The dropped words describe the maintainer's own cadence, not a seat duty; no rule is lost. The PR body's clause-survival table says the same and matches the seat's read.

Ratchet and frame. 319 lines before and after (CEILINGS 319, headroom 0, no raise asked); the line stays at 118 of the 120-byte cap; the widest table row is untouched (342/342). The four-axis block L241–261 is outside the hunk: md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0 on the head and on origin/main 697301491. No issue number enters the operating text (check:pm-skill-id-lint is one of the dev's exit-0 runs and CI's Lint · PM dispatch-gates / Lint · repo & tooling gates lanes are success on the head).

Main drift since the merge base. 6d1660dc3 → 697301491 did not touch SKILL.md (its latest touch on main is still f7e836da1; L268 on main is the old line); git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main FETCH_HEAD exits 0 (no conflict). No joint-wrong surface: the diff is one line of prose in a file nothing else moved.

Whole-package value density (the pm-dispatch skill, read from a seat that loads it): one line, net 0 bytes, closes the gap the ui seat 4 fell through on 2026-10-16 — it had read 弹窗 as the widget only. The reader is every execution seat and the director seat; the line is the one place the card-first rule lives, so the wording is where the lesson must sit. Right.

Check-runs on 04e2341e1 — the gate verdicts. 38 check-runs, all completed: 26 success — including Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, Dogfood Regression Gate, every Lint · and Type Check · lane, and the three claim checks — and 12 skipped, every one in the roster (node scripts/pm/check-expected-skips.mjs --pr 23969 → VERDICT check-expected-skips: OK — 12 skipped check-run(s), every one in the roster (exit 0)). None failed.

② Semver level

• .claude/** publishes nothing: no package's files[] ships it, so no changeset is owed and the skip-changeset label is the right declaration (present on the PR, written by the dev through label-write.mjs; Check Changeset is success).
• The PR body's second line is Clause-②: no at line start, copied from the claim (6217780898): governed rule text, no published accept set or public surface widened or narrowed. Matched and well-formed.
• No model identifier in the PR title, body (session-URL footer), the commit (model-free trailer pair) or any comment read.

③ Boundary flags

Dev report 6218172858: open_questions: [], out_of_scope_findings: [], six deviations, each answered:

• D1 base moved 161aee10 → 6d1660dc3 during worktree creation; the file is byte-identical on both and every PM reading was re-measured. Answered, and extended by this record to 697301491.
• D2 all 20 derived families run locally instead of the subset: a superset of what the order asked, reconciled by --ran to 0 NOT-MEASURED, CI still cited. Accepted.
• D3 check:doc-formula-expressions needed @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint built (exit 3 → built under the verify lock → exit 0); only gitignored dist/ written. Answered.
• D4 the commit carries the model-free trailer pair; the harness's model-named trailer reminder was not followed, per os-dev.md. Right.
• D5 the .claude/** Edit was accepted by the classifier on the first attempt; nothing routed around. A platform reading for the seat post: the dispatch order's assumption 2(e) (a [Self-Modification] refusal) did not fire this time.
• D6 the documentation label was added by the Auto Label workflow between pr_create and label-write; not the dev's write, left alone. Right (another actor's state).

Reviewer's own flags: none. The dev's mcp_calls is 0 and api_writes lists four budgeted writes (two git push, one pr_create stroke with the assignee, one labels_add, one report comment), all through the relay; no PATCH, PUT or DELETE.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-23934-card-before-popup
Reviewed-by: session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

维护者速读

改了什么:pm-dispatch 技能「卡先于弹窗」那一行原地改写(319 行不变、该行 118 字节不变):把「收件箱由维护者定期消化」换成「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」。不改代码、不加门禁、不发包。

为什么改:2026-10-16 有执行席把两件产品决策以「聊天里列 A/B/C 等你选」提给你,没先开 needs-user-decision 卡。你的原话:「需要我决策的开决策卡」「这种决策问题就是应该开决策卡,是skills 没写清楚嘛?skills也需要更新」。原规则只写「弹窗」,席位读成仅指 AskUserQuestion 控件;现在两种形态点明为同一通道:先落卡,聊天只递卡链。

风险与代价(含回滚):一行协议文字,无运行时影响。被删的「收件箱由维护者定期消化」只描述你自己的节奏,席位侧规则(L38 不等答复、L106 维护者的收件箱)仍在,「⛔ 不 assign 推送」原样保留。回滚 = revert 这一个 commit。

席位意见:ACCEPT。席位逐句核过 diff 与幸存条款(见上方 ## Contract review PASS 记录),头 04e2341e1 38 个 check 26 绿 12 预期跳过、0 红。Tier S(.claude/**)由席位落地,不需要你的批准。

你要做的:无。若不同意「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」这一措辞,在本 PR 评论一句,席位撤回入队。

席位核对

Seat domain:skills#1 · session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q (marchtian) · read 2026-10-17T12:58Z · head 04e2341e10e43b5f19caae968135e67220b83b35 · verdict: ACCEPT (Tier S — the seat lands it after the two pre-landing checks)

Implemented-by: claude/issue-23934-card-before-popup
Reviewed-by: session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q

1. Shape. Draft PR against main; body line 1 Fixes #23934, line 2 Clause-②: no (copied from claim 6217780898). The only closing keyword in the body is that line; no other open card number sits beside a closing verb. File list: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (+1/−1). Merge base 6d1660dc3; git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main FETCH_HEAD at 697301491 exits 0.
2. Premise and acceptance, read by the seat. Acceptance 1 holds: L268 now names chat prose that lists options as the popup's channel (「列选项等答的聊天即弹窗」) while keeping the card-first clause and 「⛔ 不 assign 推送」 verbatim. The dropped clause's survival is verified at L38 and L106. Acceptance 2: the four named gates exit 0 in the dev's local run and CI's Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint & Repo Gates are success on the head. Net 0 lines (budget 0 held); 118/120 bytes; frame block md5 unchanged.
3. Gates — check-runs pinned to head 04e2341e1. 38 completed: 26 success (Lint & Repo Gates, TypeScript Type Check, Test Core, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, every Lint · / Type Check · lane, the three claim checks, Dogfood Regression Gate), 12 skipped all in the roster (check-expected-skips.mjs --pr 23969 OK, exit 0), 0 failed. check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 23969: GOVERNED, Tier S, .claude/** ×1, +1/−1 under the 3000-line threshold.
4. Changeset. None owed (.claude/** unpublished); skip-changeset present, Check Changeset success. The seat concurs with the label; it is the dev's declaration confirmed, not a forwarded one.
5. Report hygiene. mcp_calls 0; api_writes four budgeted writes through the relay, no PATCH/PUT/DELETE; the dev's one API read that git could have answered: none noted. Deviations D1–D6 answered in the contract review above; D5 is a platform reading for the seat post (the .claude/** Edit was not refused this time).
6. Out of scope. None reported by the dev; none found by the seat.
7. Landing (Tier S). Pre-landing check ①: the ## Contract review PASS record above names this head. Check ②: every check green or an expected skip. Next act: relay pr_ready then automerge_enable; the probe-table landing comment follows when the queue ref is gone and origin/main carries the commit. subscribe_pr_activity is live on this PR since this fire.