[objectstack-fleet]

Fixes #24589
Clause-②: no

Every path in this diff is under .claude/** (Tier S). It publishes nothing from any package files[], so it carries skip-changeset. It stays a draft and lands only by the owning seat after a CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS on the landing head.

The ruling, verbatim

Filing gate ③, a task the maintainer directed, in the triage seat's chat (session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U, 2026-10-19). The maintainer asked 「这种卡你是不是不会处理，结果车道也不接」, then 「或者 skills 应该调整？」, and on the seat's three options answered 「B」.

The four items of the card's "What to change (the ruling, B)" are implemented at the three sites they name. Item 4 holds by construction: no gate, script or issue-create.mjs refusal is added; the diff is three rule files.

What changed

references/filing-gate.md: item 1 (old L27 is now L26 and L27; paid by deleting old L21)

 - ⛔ 不是卡:席位自己的失误、协议观察与「记住这条」,它们进座位贴或收班简报。
-- ⛔ 不是卡:三类外或无 `reach:` 的 `finding`,它们进 Acceptance notes 带 `carrier:`。
 - 「搭下个碰 X 的 PR」不算 `carrier:`;已落地工作欠的后续照立卡,⛔ 不按「不是卡」压下。
 ...
 - POST 前正文答三件:类别 ①–④、动手的读者(哪席哪步)、查重查询与命中数(含 closed)。
-- 缺任一件的卡由分诊首触即关、不定级,关单一行点名缺的是哪一件。
+- 缺件卡由分诊首触补齐能从卡与一次检索推导的三件,写进定级评论并定级。
+- 补不齐(四类皆非,或 `finding` 无 `reach:`)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。

• 「三件」 refers to the line directly above (category ①–④, the reader who acts, the dedupe query with its hit count, closed included). It is referred to, not restated. That line is the filer's POST obligation and is unchanged.
• 「写进定级评论」 is the Triage: lands in … audit comment of triage-duties.md L67. 「并定级」 replaces the ruled-away 「不定级」.
• 「因缺件」 scopes the "only" to closing for missing answers. The grading-time closures in triage-duties.md L61–L62 (「无则关」 and the tooling three-door close) still stand: a completed card is graded, and grading can still close it there.
• not_planned is spelled bare, as triage-duties.md L61 and L63 spell it.
• Two lines because one does not fit: the tightest one-line spelling of item 1 measures 138 B against the 120 B cap, and that spelling already drops "from the card and a search" and the grading comment.

Payment: deleted old L21, 「⛔ 不是卡:三类外或无 reach: 的 finding,它们进 Acceptance notes 带 carrier:。」 Both of its halves have a home elsewhere:

• An out-of-class or reach-less finding is not a card. The filer side is in the same file: L10 「立卡只为四类…⛔ 其余一律不立卡」 and L11 「其内的 finding 限三类且带 reach:」. The triage side is the new L27. SKILL.md L112 (the finding row) has 「三类外关 not planned」.
• It goes to Acceptance notes with a carrier:. See SKILL.md L282 「out_of_scope_findings 每条 … 或 carrier:(承接者);皆无 ⇒ Acceptance notes。」, .claude/agents/os-dev.md L52–L53 (carrier: defined: 「卡号或人,⛔ 非下个碰 X 的 PR」), and triage-duties.md L44 「其余进 PR ## Acceptance notes,⛔ 不立卡」.
• Why this line: no other line in the file is restated in full elsewhere. L3 is the opener that every references file carries. Old L21 sits next to the new rule and covers the same population, reach-less findings.

references/execution-duties.md L11: item 2, compressed in place

-- 自贴 `domain:*` 卡:车道合域表且正文齐 `filing-gate.md` 三件 ⇒ 候选;缺一 ⇒ 挂 `pm:retriage`。
+- 自贴 `domain:*` 卡:合域表且齐立卡门三件 ⇒ 候选;缺一 ⇒ 挂 `pm:retriage`,⛔ 只评论不算。

• 「缺一 ⇒ 挂 pm:retriage」 is kept byte for byte, and 「⛔ 只评论不算」 is added. Appending the clause to the unchanged line measures 138 B, so the line is compressed in place and no other line pays:
  • 「车道」 is dropped. The subject is already the self-applied domain:* label, and 「合域表」 is the same test.
  • 「filing-gate.md」 becomes 「立卡门」. SKILL.md L172 uses that spelling for the same rule (「正文齐立卡门三件」), and it is the ## 立卡门 heading of filing-gate.md.
  • 「正文」 is dropped on purpose. Under item 1, triage posts the completed answers in its grading comment, not in the body. With 「正文齐」, a lane would send a card that triage had already completed back to pm:retriage. SKILL.md L172 keeps 「正文齐」, which is right for its own population: untriaged self-labelled cards, where the body is the only place the answers can be.
• The ruling's reason, "the label is what puts the card in triage's sweep", is not spelled on the rule line because it already has a home: state-machine.md L10 「交接即标签:只写交接评论而不同笔挂标 = 空交接,收件箱只认标签。」 and dispatch-runbook.md L112.

references/triage-duties.md L17: item 3, rewritten in place

-- 自贴卡抽查:窗内新派发且 `domain:*` 事件与建卡同分钟者,逐张核车道、三件;⛔ 不凭 actor。
+- 自贴卡抽查:窗内新建且 `domain:*` 事件与建卡同分钟,逐张核车道、补齐三件;⛔ 不凭 actor。

• 「新派发」 becomes 「新建」. The population is now every card created in the window whose domain:* event shares the creation minute, whatever its pm:* state. That includes pm:queue, which is exactly the population 「新派发」 left out.
• Deviation, declared: the explicit 「(含 pm:queue)」 does not fit. It measures 139 B (136 B in its tightest position) against the 120 B cap, and this file has no line whose content is restated in full elsewhere to pay for a second line. The inclusion is therefore carried by 「新建」, not spelled out.
• 「三件」 becomes 「补齐三件」: complete them per filing-gate.md L26–L27. 「者」 is dropped for bytes. 「逐张」 and 「⛔ 不凭 actor」 are unchanged.

Line budget

file	lines before	lines after	ceiling	edited lines, bytes before → after
references/filing-gate.md	64	64	64	L27 93 → L26 102 + L27 113; L21 99 → deleted
references/execution-duties.md	188	188	188	L11 118 → 117
references/triage-duties.md	120	120	120	L17 120 → 120

No CEILINGS row moves. No re-wrap is used as payment. lengthVerdict(scanLineLengths()) from scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs reports "every line is within 120 bytes" for all three files.

Acceptance, measured on head a7111c84e

$ grep -n '首触即关、不定级' .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md; echo "EXIT=$?"
EXIT=1
$ grep -n '立卡门' .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md      # same-file control
1:# 立卡门与定级判据
5:## 立卡门
10:- 立卡只为四类,正文首行写立卡门类别 ①–④;⛔ 其余一律不立卡,不论它叫什么。

The three files agree:

• Triage completes what it can derive: filing-gate.md L26–L27, reached from triage-duties.md L17 (「补齐三件」).
• Lanes label pm:retriage: execution-duties.md L11 (「⛔ 只评论不算」).
• The spot-check covers queued self-labelled cards: triage-duties.md L17 (「窗内新建」).

Gates (local subset, head a7111c84e, after merging origin/main 5a871e4e4)

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derives 19 commands, and every one exited 0:

• node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs and its --self-test
• node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs
• node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test
• pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions
• pnpm check: agent-test-spelling, cross-package-test-inputs, doc-authoring, driver-memory-census, gitlink-declared, nul-bytes, pm-governed-merges, pm-half-states, pm-label-write, pm-skill-id-lint, pm-skill-ratchet, refd-timer-probe, skill-frame-sync, watch-hint-literal

--ran reconciliation: 「19 derived, 19 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN」. Notes:

• On its first run check:doc-formula-expressions exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: formula and lint were unbuilt). That run measured nothing. Both packages were then built under the verify lock, and the re-run exited 0.
• The derived check:pm-half-states invocation is the self-test. The live run takes CI's --provenance value, so it is NOT MEASURED locally.
• check:pm-settings-deny-roster and check:pm-governed-prose were also run (both exit 0) because their rosters live under .claude.
• This is text-only .claude/**: no build closure, no package tests, no ablation.

Acceptance notes

• Open fork for the seat, not chosen here. The ruled new L27 closes a non-exception finding with no reach: at first touch, not_planned. triage-duties.md L50 says the opposite: 「缺 reach: 且非例外 ⇒ 定 priority:p3,并入收口卡或清扫卡,⛔ 不单独派发、不因此关卡。」 Both texts cannot hold at once.
  • L50 is outside this card's claimed file surface (three named lines), and choosing between the two rules is not this dev's call. It is reported in the dev report's open_questions with options.
  • SKILL.md L112 (「三类外关 not planned」), SKILL.md L284 (「门外已立卡关 not planned」) and triage-duties.md L79 (「三类内无证据拒收」) already lean the new line's way.
  • carrier: the PM seat for this card.
• The reach-less finding rule's former not-a-card bullet is now covered by L10–L11 plus the triage-side close. The carrier: token on the next line (now L21) is defined at SKILL.md L282 and os-dev.md L53. carrier: none, noted only.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:三份分诊/车道规则各改一处。① 立卡门:自贴标签的卡缺「类别/动手的读者/查重」三件时,分诊第一次碰到先自己补齐(从卡面和一次检索就能推出来的),写进定级评论并照常定级;只有补不齐的(四类都不是,或 finding 没有 reach:)才关单 not_planned,一句话说清缺什么。② 车道:发现自贴卡缺件必须挂 pm:retriage 标签,只留评论不算。③ 分诊抽查:从「窗内新派发」放宽到「窗内新建」的自贴卡,已排队的也查,逐张核车道并补齐三件。

为什么改:当天七张自贴卡缺件。车道按规则不接,但只留了评论没挂标,分诊的扫描又只看已派发的卡,结果卡悬空没人管。按旧条文分诊会把七张全关掉(含一张实测占 CPU 11.8% 的 p1),每张关了重立约四笔写入,还丢线程。改后是补齐定级,少关少重立。

风险与代价(含回滚):纯文本,只动 .claude/**,不发布,行数不变、无新门禁;回滚 = revert 本 PR 一个提交。代价一:为腾行删了立卡门里一条「三类外或无 reach: 的 finding 不是卡」,其内容在同文件第 10–11 行和 SKILL.md 报告契约里仍有。代价二:抽查行装不下「含 pm:queue」字样,靠「新建」一词涵盖。待定一处:分诊职责第 50 行仍写「缺 reach: 定 p3、不因此关卡」,与这次裁决「finding 无 reach: 首触关」相反,需席位/维护者定夺,本 PR 未选边。

席位意见:

你要做的:无。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[objectstack-fleet]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: a7111c84eb6595640e0063e1e522ac9f5936ef36
Local-runs: none
Scope: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md + .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (L112, L172, L282, L284), .claude/agents/os-dev.md (L52–L53), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/state-machine.md (L10), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md (L112), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md (L38), scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs (the CEILINGS rows for the three files and MAX_LINE_BYTES), scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs, scripts/pm/label-write.mjs, scripts/pm/check-governed-prose.mjs (what each pins on the three files)

Inputs: card #24589 body and both comments (the Claim: comment 6270547230 and the os-dev-report 6271355842); PR #24602 body, file list and the net diff against main at the head (3 files, +4/−4, the head being a merge of origin/main); every cited file read at the head with git show; the head's check-runs read twice. Face: governed rule text under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**. reviewFace on the file list returns all three paths as hits, so there is no remainder for a lane-seat ACCEPT at TIER_DEFAULT.

① Derived judgments

1. Accept set and public surface: none. All three paths are internal protocol text: not skills/** (the customer-published dir), not packages/spec/src/**, not inside any package files[]. No schema, exported type, CLI flag, REST door or runtime behaviour moves. Right.
2. Face and tier. Governed rule text ⇒ CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER; the whole diff is on the face. Right.
3. filing-gate.md new L26 (102 B) 「缺件卡由分诊首触补齐能从卡与一次检索推导的三件,写进定级评论并定级。」 is ruling item 1's first half: complete from the card and one search, post in the grading comment, grade. 「三件」 binds to L25 (category ①–④, the reader who acts, the dedupe query with its hit count incl. closed), which is unchanged; 「定级评论」 is the audit comment triage-duties.md L67 requires; the ruled-away 「不定级」 is gone. Right.
4. filing-gate.md new L27 (113 B) 「补不齐(四类皆非,或 finding 无 reach:)者才因缺件首触即关 not_planned,一行点名所缺。」 is ruling item 1's second half as written: close at first touch only what cannot be completed (none of the four categories, or a finding with no reach:), not_planned, one line naming what is missing. Consistent with the same file's L10–L11 (a finding inside ① must carry reach:) and with triage-duties.md L61's bare not_planned spelling. Right to the ruling. It overlaps triage-duties.md L50 (unchanged, the 2026-09-25 reach ruling) in the opposite direction for a non-exception reach-less finding: 「首触即关」 here, 「⛔ 不因此关卡」 there. Carried to ③, not re-decided here.
5. filing-gate.md old L21 deleted as the line-neutral payment (「⛔ 不是卡:三类外或无 reach: 的 finding,它们进 Acceptance notes 带 carrier:。」). Each half survives at the head: the filer-side "not a card" at the same file's L10 (four categories only) and L11 (finding 限三类且带 reach:), the triage-side close at new L27 and SKILL.md L112 (「三类外关 not planned」); the Acceptance-notes-with-carrier: half at SKILL.md L282, os-dev.md L52–L53 (carrier: defined there) and triage-duties.md L44 (「其余进 PR ## Acceptance notes,⛔ 不立卡」). A grep of the whole head tree outside the three files for the deleted and rewritten sentences and for filing-gate.md:27, L27, L21, execution-duties.md:11, triage-duties.md:17 returns nothing, so no pointer went stale. Right. Residual: the next line (now L21) uses carrier: with its definition out of file. Acceptable, no action.
6. execution-duties.md L11 (117 B) keeps 「缺一 ⇒ 挂 pm:retriage」 byte for byte (visible in the hunk) and adds 「⛔ 只评论不算」, ruling item 2. 「车道」 is redundant with 合域表 whose subject is already the self-applied domain:*; 「正文」 is rightly dropped because under new L26 the answers may live in triage's grading comment, and keeping it would bounce a completed card back to pm:retriage; 立卡门 is the spelling SKILL.md L172 and filing-gate.md's ## 立卡门 heading already use. SKILL.md L172 (「正文齐立卡门三件 ⇒ 执行席直接认领」) is untouched and not in conflict: it is a sufficient condition for a direct claim of an untriaged self-labelled card, while L11 is the lane's candidate test, and a card triage has completed and graded carries priority:* and leaves that population. The ruling's reason sentence (the label is what puts the card in triage's sweep) is not on the line and has homes at state-machine.md L10 (「交接即标签 … 收件箱只认标签」) and dispatch-runbook.md L112 (「评论不是任何人的收件箱,标签才是」); cross-repo-coordination.md L38 (「挂 pm:retriage + 异议评论同笔」) points the same way. Right.
7. triage-duties.md L17 (120 B, exactly the cap) 「自贴卡抽查:窗内新建且 domain:* 事件与建卡同分钟,逐张核车道、补齐三件;⛔ 不凭 actor。」 — 「新派发」→「新建」 widens the spot-check from cards dispatched in the window to every card created in the window whose domain:* event shares the creation minute, whatever its pm:* state; that is ruling item 3's population and it contains pm:queue cards, since the old word 新派发 was the only thing excluding them. 「三件」→「补齐三件」 chains to filing-gate.md L26–L27. The explicit 「(含 pm:queue)」 is absent (dev deviation, answered in ③). Right.
8. Ruling item 4 (no new gate). The file list is three rule files; no script, workflow or issue-create.mjs change. Right by construction.
9. Rule and gate read as one. No gate encodes any of the three rules at the head: check-half-states.mjs cites triage-duties.md only for the fire-time layer clause (「选层按 fire 时刻」), label-write.mjs only for the RECLAIM_AFTER_HOURS clock, and check-governed-prose.mjs pins register globs inside AGENTS.md and SKILL.md regions, not these files. So no gate diverged from the text. The one gate over these files is the line ratchet: CEILINGS rows 64 / 188 / 120 unmoved; head line counts 64 / 188 / 120 (same as main); MAX_LINE_BYTES 120 with the rule bytes at most 120 compliant; the changed lines measure (git show … | sed -n Np | wc -c, minus the newline) 102, 113, 117 and 120 B. No CEILINGS move, no re-wrap used as payment. Right.
10. Card acceptance. grep -n '首触即关、不定级' on the head's filing-gate.md returns nothing (exit 1). The three files agree on the three enumerated points: triage completes (filing-gate.md L26–L27, reached from triage-duties.md L17), lanes label pm:retriage (execution-duties.md L11), the spot-check covers queued self-labelled cards (triage-duties.md L17). The PR body quotes the maintainer's three utterances verbatim. All met.
11. Check-runs on the head. 26 check-runs, read three times (16:03, 16:05 and 16:09 UTC on 2026-10-19). At the last read: 2 completed / success (filter and Dogfood Regression Gate, both path filters, completed 15:46 UTC); 6 in_progress (Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests, Lint · scoped · query-options erasure, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Check PR Size); 18 still queued with no conclusion, among them Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, Type Check · workspace, Test Core and the two other claim guards. No run has failed. Recorded as read; the landing precondition 「PR check 全绿」 (contract-review.md L39) is the seat's at landing time and this record does not stand in for it. The dev report's local 19/19 exit-0 run is not adopted as a gate verdict.

② Semver level

Nothing is published: no path under any package files[], packages/**, skills/** or content/docs/**. The skip-changeset label is on the PR and no .changeset/* file is in the diff — right. The PR body's line 2 reads Clause-②: no at the line start; no narrowing and no accept-set change, so the declaration matches what the diff publishes (nothing). Check Changeset is among the queued runs. Right.

③ Boundary flags

• open_questions[0] — filing-gate.md L27 vs triage-duties.md L50. Confirmed real, escalated, not re-decided. L50 arrived with the 2026-09-25 reach ruling (PR docs(pm-dispatch, os-dev): a finding files only with measured reachability; same-family findings fold into one class-closure card; triage gates unproven ones to p3 #20110, card skills(pm-dispatch / os-dev): file a finding only with measured reachability (checked by the finder at filing), fold same-family findings into a class-closure card, triage sends unproven ones to p3 — maintainer 「同意」 #20088; its commit body: "triage never takes the card off the board for that reason (关卡归维护者)"; the maintainer's 「同意」). New L27 has triage close a non-exception reach-less finding not_planned at first touch. In the overlap — a reach-less finding that is also missing an answer — the two lines point opposite ways; a partition reading (L27 only for 缺件 cards, L50 for complete-but-reach-less ones) narrows the overlap but does not remove it. Whether the maintainer's 「B」 covered this clause cannot be read off the card, because the three options' text is not quoted there. This review does not adopt the dev's preferred option (amend L50 in place): reversing a clause the maintainer ruled on 09-25 needs the maintainer's word, as the dev itself says. One correction to the PR body's lean: SKILL.md L112 「三类外关 not planned」 and L284 「门外已立卡关 not planned」 concern cards outside the three classes, not reach-less findings inside them; only triage-duties.md L79 「三类内无证据拒收」 bears on the same population. Escalation: the seat carries the fork (amend L50, or narrow L27 to the four-categories case) to the maintainer through the card's decision channel or the batch of at most five items; either answer is one line-neutral edit in a follow-up round. Not a FAIL ground: the text is ruling item 1 as written, and the card's acceptance names no L50 reconciliation.
• Deviation — triage-duties.md L17 without 「(含 pm:queue)」. Answered, accepted. 「新建」 is a superset of 「新派发」 and admits queued cards by construction; the line sits at 120 B and the file at 120/120, so the spelling has no room without a deletion. The semantic equals the ruling's.
• Deviation — execution-duties.md L11 drops 「车道」 and 「正文」, spells 立卡门, leaves the reason sentence off the line. Answered, accepted (judgment 6; every home verified at the head).
• Deviation — old filing-gate.md L21 deleted as payment. Answered, accepted (judgment 5); the residual out-of-file carrier: definition is noted, no action.
• Deviation — triage-duties.md L50 left unchanged. Answered: correct restraint; L50 is outside the claimed surface and the dispatch forbade choosing sides. See the fork above.
• Deviation — the shared repository was deepened. Answered: a process observation, additive to the object store, no effect on the diff or on this face; for the seat's round report, not this record.
• Deviation — origin/main merged once, the head is the merge commit. Answered: the net diff against main is the three-file +4/−4 change; nothing else rides on the head.
• Deviation — commit trailers. Answered, correct: both commits end with the model-free pair AGENTS.md L460–L461 names (the Claude-Session: session URL and the generic co-author line); AGENTS.md's pre-push hook refuses a model identifier in that pair, so the harness-reminder trailer was rightly not used.
• Deviation — the relay stroke exited 6 UNCONFIRMED and was not re-sent. Answered, correct: the target was read; PR docs(pm-dispatch): triage completes a self-labelled card's derivable filing-gate answers at first touch; lanes label pm:retriage; the spot-check covers queued cards #24602 exists as a draft, assignee os-warren, labels documentation / size/xs / skip-changeset.
• out_of_scope_findings: (1) the fork — handled above; (2) carrier: defined out of file — noted; (3) a relay run reading queued after its writes had landed — an Actions read-lag observation, correctly not filed (filing-gate.md L20: protocol observations go to the seat post). None needs a card.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-24589-triage-completes-self-labelled
Reviewed-by: session_014kWeosxNDsHDT6TuQHLmC1

VERDICT: PASS

[objectstack-fleet]

维护者速读(终稿)

• 改了什么: 三份分诊/车道规则各改一处,行数不变、每行 ≤120 字节。① 立卡门(filing-gate.md 第 26–27 行):自贴标签的卡缺「类别 / 动手的读者 / 查重」三件时,分诊第一次碰到先补齐能从卡面与一次检索推出的部分,写进定级评论并照常定级;只有补不齐的(四类都不是,或 finding 没有 reach:)才关 not_planned,一行写清缺什么。为腾行删了旧第 21 行「三类外或无 reach: 的 finding 不是卡」,其两半在同文件第 10–11 行与 SKILL.md 报告契约行里仍在。② 车道(execution-duties.md 第 11 行):自贴卡缺件必须挂 pm:retriage,只留评论不算。③ 分诊抽查(triage-duties.md 第 17 行):从「窗内新派发」放宽到「窗内新建」的自贴卡,已排队的也查,逐张核车道并补齐三件。
• 为什么改: 您在分诊席会话裁了「B」(三句原话见 PR 正文)。当天七张自贴卡缺件:车道按规则不接但只留了评论,分诊的抽查又只看已派发的卡,卡悬空没人管;按旧条文分诊会把七张全关,每张关了重立约四笔写入,还丢线程。
• 风险与代价(含回滚): 纯文本,只动 .claude/**,不发布,无新门禁;回滚 = revert 一个提交。一处待定:新第 27 行「finding 无 reach: 首触即关」与 triage-duties.md 第 50 行(您 2026-09-25 的「同意」:缺 reach: 定 p3 并入收口卡、不因此关卡)方向相反;本 PR 照裁决原文落行、未动第 50 行,矛盾已单立决策卡 [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 等您 A/B。
• 席位意见: 接受。diff 与裁决四项逐字对得上;行数、字节、验收 grep 由席位在 head 上复测一致;达档复核 PASS 在案(评论 6271676253)。第 50 行的分叉是两条裁决相遇,不是本 PR 的缺陷,按「两条细则冲突 ⇒ 按更严的一条行动并立卡」处理。
• 你要做的: 无。Tier S,由席位在 CI 全绿后经中继入队落地;[Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 另等您一个字母。

席位核对

ACCEPT · skills seat 2 · session_014kWeosxNDsHDT6TuQHLmC1 · 2026-10-19T16:12Z · head a7111c84eb6595640e0063e1e522ac9f5936ef36

1. 形态: draft, base main, body first line Fixes #24589, line-start Clause-②: no; assignee os-warren; labels documentation · size/xs · skip-changeset; 3 files, +4/−4, every path under .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/ ⇒ Tier S by get_files. The body was read in full: no other card number sits next to a closing keyword.
2. 前提实测(席位在 head 上复测): git diff origin/main...a7111c84e is the three hunks the report names and nothing else; line counts 64 / 188 / 120 unchanged; changed-line bytes L26 102 · L27 113 · L11 117 · L17 120 (sed -n Np | wc -c, newline excluded); acceptance grep 「首触即关、不定级」 → 0 hits (exit 1) with same-file control 「立卡门」 → 3 hits; no issue number in the three files; origin/main 5a871e4e4 is an ancestor of the head.
3. 门禁 check-runs on the head (read at 2026-10-19T16:12Z): 5 success (Test Core · filter · No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path · Auto Label · Dogfood Regression Gate) · 9 in_progress · 12 queued (among them Lint & Repo Gates · TypeScript Type Check · Governed Surface Queue Guard · Check Changeset) · 4 skipped (Check PR Size · Build Docs · Auto Label · the Dogfood matrix row). Not converged; this ACCEPT does not read them as green. Landing waits for every check on this head green or an expected skip.
4. 接受的偏差: (a) triage-duties.md L17 carries 「含 pm:queue」 by 「新建」 rather than spelling it (120/120 B, no payable line); (b) execution-duties.md L11 drops 「车道」「正文」 and spells 立卡门, the reason sentence living at state-machine.md L10 and dispatch-runbook.md L112; (c) filing-gate.md old L21 deleted as the line payment, both halves verified at the head (L10–L11; SKILL.md 报告契约 carrier: line; os-dev.md L52–L53; triage-duties.md L44); (d) the head is a merge of origin/main, the net diff unchanged; (e) the pr_create relay stroke exited 6 UNCONFIRMED and the target was read instead of re-sent — correct.
5. 范围外去向: the new L27 vs triage-duties.md L50 contradiction → decision card [Decision] A finding filed without reach:, at first touch — close it not_planned (ruling B on the filing-gate completion card) or grade it p3 and fold it into a collector card (the 2026-09-25 「同意」 behind triage-duties line 50)? #24610 (filing gate ②, linked to pm-dispatch: a self-labelled card missing filing-gate answers is completed by triage at first touch, not closed; lanes always mark pm:retriage; triage spot-checks queued self-labelled cards too #24589); carrier: defined out of file → noted, no card; a relay run reading queued after its writes landed → seat post note, no card; the dev's git fetch --deepen on the shared repository (to 2026-09-05) → seat post note.
6. 落地条款: Tier S. Contract review of record 6271676253 (Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, head a7111c84e, Implemented-by the branch, Reviewed-by this session, PASS). This seat lands via the relay ops pr_ready + automerge_enable once every check on this head is green or an expected skip, node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 24602 reads Tier S, and mergeable_state is re-read at that moment (now blocked = checks pending, mergeable: true). Any push after this record moves the head and voids both records.