Repository navigation
TextInput desynchronizes with its native counterpart #37722
Description
Description
React TextInput component can go "out of sync" with the native text input widget. The desynchronization can be triggered by quick user interactions. The problem becomes severe when the efficiency of the application code is not perfect; in this case, the user's interactions don't have to be quick to trigger the desynchronization.
The React TextInput component eventually re-synchronizes with its native counterpart, but the user experience and application behavior are affected.
See "Steps to reproduce" for the example and details.
React Native Version
0.71.7
Output of npx react-native info
System:
OS: macOS 13.3
CPU: (12) arm64 Apple M2 Max
Memory: 13.88 GB / 64.00 GB
Shell: 5.9 - /bin/zsh
Binaries:
Node: 16.15.1 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v16.15.1/bin/node
Yarn: 1.22.19 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v16.15.1/bin/yarn
npm: 8.11.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v16.15.1/bin/npm
Watchman: Not Found
Managers:
CocoaPods: 1.12.0 - /opt/homebrew/bin/pod
SDKs:
iOS SDK:
Platforms: DriverKit 22.2, iOS 16.2, macOS 13.1, tvOS 16.1, watchOS 9.1
Android SDK: Not Found
IDEs:
Android Studio: 2022.2 AI-222.4459.24.2221.9787799
Xcode: 14.2/14C18 - /usr/bin/xcodebuild
Languages:
Java: 18.0.2 - /usr/bin/javac
npmPackages:
@react-native-community/cli: Not Found
react: 18.2.0 => 18.2.0
react-native: 0.71.7 => 0.71.7
react-native-macos: Not Found
npmGlobalPackages:
react-native: Not Found
Steps to reproduce
Let's consider the example app, which consists of a TextInput component and a "Clear input" button, which clears the text input. A real-life case would be a chat app with a "Send" button.
This is a Git repository with the MCVE.
- Type something into the text input, for example, "abcd"
- Press "Clear input", but immediately after that type some letter, let's say "e" (it's easier on an emulator, but possible on a physical device too, especially if it has an older CPU)
- Observe the text input content
- Expected content: "e"
- Actual content (if the problem is reproduced): "abcde"
Screen recording:
TextInput-sync-1.mp4
If the performance of the application JavaScript code is not-so-good, at step 2. you don't have to type the next letter immediately. If the task in which the TextInput is cleared takes 200 ms, the window to trigger the unexpected behavior will have 200 ms.
You can experiment with the performance implications in the provided MCVE by enabling the "Slow down" switch. It will artificially slow down the render by adding an extra computation.
Screen recording with non-ideal performance:
TextInput-sync-2.mp4
Snack, code example, screenshot, or link to a repository
https://github.com/cubuspl42/react-native-TextInput-sync-issue-mcve-1
Activity
github-actions commentedon Jun 6, 2023
jakub-trzebiatowski commentedon Jun 6, 2023
Also reproducible on 0.71.8. I pushed the new revision of the MCVE with all dependencies upgraded to their newest versions.
hannojg commentedon Jul 2, 2024
I've worked on this issue and found multiple possible solutions, but only one that really seems to make sense.
🔎 The problem
Imagine the following flow:
valueto"", or calling.clear()[both do the same under the hood])In react native the text input sends the whole text that's currently in the text input in the
onChange/onChangeTextevent callbacks. However, we maintain the "source of truth" for our text input in JavaScript in our react state variablevaluewhich we pass as a prop to the<TextInput value={value} />.So it can happen that we set our JS value to
""to clear the input, but the native side is ignoring that event (as the JS thread is lagging behind in events), and sends us instead a new update with the current native input, which would be "aaaaaabbbbbb" by then.Solution 🅰: make
.clear()a separate view command that bypasses the event count mechanismWhen calling
textInputRef.current.clear()we currently issue a view command calledsetTextAndSelection("", 0, 0, mostRecentEventCount), which is basically the same as apssing the propvalue={""}, as this would also call thesetTextAndSelectionview command.We could add a new view command
clear()that bypasses the event count mechanism and just clears the native text input.This would basically mean that we will never ignore an explicit clear event.
Lets assume the flow from above, here is what the user would see:
Additionally the text input wouldn't be cleared immediately when calling
clear(), but only when the native side receives the command.Solution 🅱: Control from a single thread / have one source of truth
Currently when using the
valueprop, there are two sources of truth:valuestate in the JS threadOne could think of a solution where the input is completely controlled by the
valuefrom JS. Meaning when a change happens, the change is first dispatched to JS, and only if thevalueproperty updates the update is reflected in the native view.The updating of the native text input would be bound to the performance of the JS thread. Lets say its very busy and only "performs at 10 FPS", then our UI updates would appear lagging to the user.
Solution 🅲: Maintain an event order by using timestamps
When we update the state of the textInput component (using the
valueprop) we attach a timestamp of the event.Internally an order/stream of events is maintained from which the current displayed input text is constructed.
{ type: 'clear', timestamp: 1 }{ type: 'text', text: 'b', timestamp: 2 }, now text input is "aaaaaab"{ type: 'text', text: 'b', timestamp: 3 }, now text input is "aaaaaabb"{ type: 'clear', timestamp: 1 }{ type: 'text', text: 'b', timestamp: 2 }{ type: 'text', text: 'b', timestamp: 3 }So the user would see "aaaaaa" -> "aaaaaabb" -> "bb".
The good part is that opposed to solution 🅰 we wouldn't drop any text.
Implementing an event order system is not trivial and could lead to a lot of complexity.
Solution 🅳: Only apply partial updates from the native side to our JS
valueInstead of fully setting the whole native text we receive, we can only apply the updates that happened to the text to our JS
value.Meaning if the input was "aaaaaa" and the user types "b", instead of taking the native text update and setting "aaaaaab" as our
value, we just take the change"b"and append it to our value:valueis "aaaaaa"valueto"""b"and appends it to ourvalue, resulting in"" + "b"="b"valueprop, showing "b"So the user would see "aaaaaa" -> "aaaaaab" -> "b".
For a brief moment the user might still see an unexpected input text "aaaaaab" before it gets updated to "b".
However, we didn't drop any text and its quite easy to implement such a solution.
Where to go from here
The overarching problem is that we have two threads that communicate asynchronously with each other.
While the JS thread dispatched a clear event and we're waiting on the native side to receive it, the user might have already typed new text on the UI thread.
Given this architecture I feel like solution 🅳 is the most feasible one, as it doesn't require a complete rewrite of the text input component and is quite easy to implement.
We only need to add information about the range in which the native text was changed. I created a PR here, which does that:
I applied the changes from the PR to the reproducer of this issue:
BEFORE.webm
FIXED.webm
hannojg commentedon Jul 18, 2024
I started a discussion here to discuss with meta how to fix this:
altmshfkgudtjr commentedon Nov 8, 2024
Is there any solution to this issue?
I’m currently working on a project, but I’m having difficulty finding an alternative approach.